State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 188

ORDER re Dismissal with Prejudice as to the Epson Defendants filed by Jaco Electronics, Inc., Rockwell Automation Inc., Viewsonic Corporation. 7635 . Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 3/11/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2013)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

4
5

In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

6

MDL No. 1827
This Document Relates To:

7
8
9
10
11

Master Docket No. C M:07-01827 SI

Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation,
et al., Case 11-cv-02495-SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case 12-cv-02495-SI
ViewSonic Corporation v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case 12-cv-00335-SI

12
13
14
15

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1.

Claims asserted by Plaintiff Jaco Electronics, Inc. against Defendants Epson

16

Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice

17

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

18

2.

Claims asserted by Plaintiff Rockwell Automation, Inc. against Defendants Epson

19

Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice

20

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

21

3.

Claims asserted by Plaintiff ViewSonic Corporation against Defendants Epson

22

Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice

23

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

24

4.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

[Proposed] Order
Case No. 07-01827 SI

1
2

5.

This Order does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiffs against any other

defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigations.

3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
This ____ day of ______, 2013
11th
March

7
8

Hon. Susan Y. Illston
United States District Court Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-2-

[Proposed] Order
Case No. 07-01827-SI