State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
230
ORDER granting Stipulation Filed in MDL Master Case by Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs' and State Attorneys General's Joint Report of Settlement Fund Distribution and Request for an Order Authorizing Distribution of Residual Amounts, MDL D.E. 9498. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/4/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Craig C. Corbitt (83251)
Judith A. Zahid (215418)
Qianwei Fu (242669)
Heather T. Rankie (268002)
ZELLE HOFMANN
VOELBEL & MASON
LLP
44 Montgomery Street,
Suite 3400
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 693-0700
Facsimile: (415) 693-0770
ccorbitt@zelle.com
Francis O. Scarpulla (41059)
LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS
O. SCARPULLA
456 Montgomery Street,
17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 788-7210
Facsimile: (415) 788-0706
fos@scarpullalaw.com
Joseph M. Alioto (42680)
Theresa D. Moore (99978)
ALIOTO LAW FIRM
225 Bush Street, 16th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 434-8900
Facsimile: (415) 434-9200
jmalioto@aliotolaw.com
8
Co-Lead Class Counsel for Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
)
)
)
)
)
This Document Relates to:
)
)
Indirect-Purchaser Class Action;
)
)
State of Missouri, et al. v. AU Optronics
)
Corporation, et al., Case No. 10-cv-3619;
)
State of Florida v. AU Optronics Corporation, )
)
et al., Case No. 10-cv-3517; and
)
)
State of New York v. AU Optronics
)
Corporation, et al., Case No. 11-cv-0711.
)
)
Case No. 3:07-MD-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827
[PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING
DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL
SETTLEMENT FUNDS
The Honorable Susan Illston
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SETTLEMENT FUNDS
1
The Court, having reviewed the joint status report and recommendation submitted by
2
Class Counsel for the Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs and the Attorneys General of the States of
3
Arkansas, California, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New York, West Virginia, and Wisconsin
4
(“Settling States”), and good cause appearing, hereby ORDERS:
5
6
7
8
9
1.
Rust shall make a total additional distribution of $2,125,026.74 to timely-filed but
underpaid or unpaid claims as specified in paragraph 9 of Rust’s declaration;
2.
Rust shall distribute payments to the 119 claims with claims that were filed
between June 7, 2014 and October 6, 2014 at the pro rata amount of $4.57 per panel equivalent.
3.
Rust shall promptly distribute the remaining shares of the uncashed payments to
10
eligible claimants and void all uncashed payments 30 (thirty) days after final reissuance of
11
payments are mailed.
12
13
4.
The following amounts may be deducted from each settling defendant’s
Settlement Fund to pay Rust’s costs of claims administration:
14
Chimei
15
Chunghwa
$2,483.93
16
Epson
$1,334.41
17
HannStar
$12,009.70
18
Hitachi
$18,249.70
19
Samsung
20
Sharp
$54,078.78
21
AUO
$75,616.65
22
LG
23
Toshiba
$9,832.51
24
TOTAL
$506,634.18
25
5.
$51,631.57
$112,371.48
$169,025.45
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. shall wire $506,634.18 to the following account:
26
Bank of Texas
27
ABA/Routing # 111014325
28
Account # 8093434387
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SETTLEMENT FUNDS
1
Account Name: Rust Consulting
2
Reference # 128325
3
Federal Tax ID # 41-1813634
4
Bank Contact: Mayra Landeros, (214) 987-8817
5
6
The balance of funds in the demand-deposit account, if any, shall be retained for
additional costs as they are incurred.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated:
1/4/16
, 2015
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
3267939
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SETTLEMENT FUNDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?