State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 31

ORDER granting time to respond in Florida Action (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No. 95987
HERMAN J. HOYING, State Bar No. 257495
KRISTIE A. BLUETT, State Bar No. 254919
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.,
HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.
[Additional moving defendants and
counsel listed on signature pages]

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

14
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

No. 3:07-md-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827

17

This Document Relates To:

18

No. 3:10-cv-03517-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING TIME TO
RESPOND IN FLORIDA ACTION

19

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,

15
16

21
22
23

Hon. Susan Illston

Plaintiffs,

20
v.

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

24
25
26

WHEREAS, on April 13, 2011, the Florida Attorney General (“Florida”) filed an
Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case (Dkt. No. 2652);

27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 3:10-CV-03517 SI; 3:07-md 1827 SI

T

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS, Defendants’ responses to the Amended Complaint are currently due May 2,
2011;
WHEREAS, Defendants have requested and Florida has agreed to additional time for
Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint;

5

THEREFORE, Florida and Defendants hereby agree that:

6

(a)

Defendants’ response(s) to the Amended Complaint shall be due on May 16, 2011.

7

(b)

Except as set forth above, all Federal and Local Rules shall remain in effect with

8

respect to the pleadings and the briefing on motions. Entering into this stipulation does

9

not constitute a waiver of any defense, including under Federal Rule of Civil

10

Procedure 12.

11

(c)

The parties respectfully request the Court to enter this stipulation as an order.

12
13

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

14

DATED:

April 22, 2011

15
16
17

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF FLORIDA

18
19

By /s/ Nicholas J. Weilhammer
Nicholas J. Weilhammer

20

Nicholas J. Weilhammer (pro hac vice)
Assistant Attorney General
PL-01, The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

21
22
23

Attorneys for Plaintiff
STATE OF FLORIDA

24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 3:10-CV-03517 SI; 3:07-md 1827 SI

1
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
2
3
By
4
5

Kent M. Roger (State Bar No. 95987)
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS,
LTD., AND HITACHI ELECTRONIC
DEVICES (USA), INC.

9
10
11

/s/ Kent M. Roger
Kent M. Roger

NOSSAMAN LLP

12
13

By

14

/s/ Christopher A. Nedeau
Christopher A. Nedeau
Christopher A. Nedeau (State Bar No. 81297)
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU
OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 3:10-CV-03517 SI; 3:07-md 1827 SI

1
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
2
3
By
4
5

/s/ Christopher B. Hockett
Christopher B. Hockett
Christopher B. Hockett (State Bar No. 121539)
Neal A. Potischman (State Bar No. 254862)
Sandra West (State Bar No. 250389)
Samantha H. Knox (State Bar No. 254427)
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants
CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION (f/k/a
CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORP.),
CMO JAPAN CO., LTD., AND CHI MEI
OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.

10
11
12
13

K&L GATES LLP

14
15

By

16

/s/ Ramona M. Emerson
Ramona M. Emerson
Hugh F. Bangasser (pro hac vice)
Ramona M. Emerson (pro hac vice)
Christopher M. Wyant (pro hac vice)
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 290
Seattle, WA 98104
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

17
18
19
20

Attorneys for Defendants
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

3

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 3:10-CV-03517 SI; 3:07-md 1827 SI

1
2

CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON
LLP

3
4

By

5

/s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz
Michael R. Lazerwitz
Michael R. Lazerwitz (pro hac vice)
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD. AND LG DISPLAY
AMERICA, INC.

9
10
11

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

12
13

By

14

/s/ Timothy C. Hester
Timothy C. Hester
Timothy C. Hester (pro hac vice)
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

4

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 3:10-CV-03517 SI; 3:07-md 1827 SI

1
2

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN
LLP

3
4

By

/s/ John M. Grenfell
John M. Grenfell

5
John M. Grenfell (State Bar No. 88500)
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
SHARP CORPORATION AND SHARP
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

9
10
11

WHITE & CASE LLP

12
13

By

14

/s/ John H. Chung
John H. Chung
John H. Chung (pro hac vice)
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

15
16
17

Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice)
Kristen J. McAhren (pro hac vice)
701 Thirteenth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20005
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

18
19
20
21

Attorneys for Defendants
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA
MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD., TOSHIBA
AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS,
INC., AND TOSHIBA AMERICA
INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.

22
23
24
25

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from the above signatories.

26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

5

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 3:10-CV-03517 SI; 3:07-md 1827 SI

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

5/22
Dated: ____________________, 2011
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

6

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING TIME TO RESPOND
Case No. 3:10-CV-03517 SI; 3:07-md 1827 SI