State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 79

ORDER Extending Sharp's Time to Answer Florida's Amended Complaint by Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation. (Lutz, Lindsay) (Filed on 11/7/2011) (Entered: 11/07/2 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA Bar No. 88500) john.grenfell@pillsburylaw.com JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA Bar No. 209134) jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice) fusae.nara@pillsburylaw.com ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479) andrew.lanphere@pillsburylaw.com 50 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 983-1000 Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 Attorneys for Defendants SHARP CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827 This Document Relates To: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING SHARP’S TIME TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 17 18 19 20 Case No. 2010-CV-3517 SI STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, 21 22 23 Plaintiff, v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 500932080v1 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827 1 WHEREAS plaintiff State of Florida filed an Amended Complaint in the above- 2 captioned case against Defendants AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation 3 America, Chi Mei Innolux Corp., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, 4 Inc., Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic 5 Devices (USA), Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America Inc., Samsung Electronics 6 Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sharp 7 Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display 8 Technology Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba America 9 Electronic Components, Inc. on April 13, 2011, Dkt. no. 2652; 10 WHEREAS Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation (together, 11 “Sharp”), jointly with other defendants in this action, filed a motion to dismiss the 12 Amended Complaint on May 20, 2011; 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS the Court denied defendants’ joint motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint on September 15, 2011; WHEREAS Sharp desires a reasonable amount of time to answer the Amended Complaint; WHEREAS the Court previously entered an Order extending the time to answer the Amended Complaint on October 7, 2011, as stipulated by Plaintiff and Sharp; and WHEREAS the requested time modification will not affect any other deadline in this case. THEREFORE, the State of Florida and Sharp hereby agree that Sharp’s deadline to answer to the Amended Complaint shall be November 28, 2011. Dated: November 7, 2011 24 25 26 27 28 -1500932080v1 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827 1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 2 By: /s/ Nicholas J. Weilhammer R. Scott Palmer Lizabeth A. Brady Nicholas J. Weilhammer (pro hac vice) Office of the Attorney General State of Florida PL-01, The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050 (850) 414-3300 (Phone) (850) 488-9134 (Facsimile) Nicholas.weilhammer@myfloridalegal.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP JOHN M. GRENFELL JACOB R. SORENSEN FUSAE NARA ANDREW D. LANPHERE 50 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 9 10 11 12 13 By: 14 /s/ John M. Grenfell John M. Grenfell 15 Attorneys for Defendants SHARP CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 16 17 ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that the 18 concurrence of the other signatory hereto has been obtained. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: ______________ 22 Honorable Susan Illston 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2500932080v1 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?