State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
79
ORDER Extending Sharp's Time to Answer Florida's Amended Complaint by Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation. (Lutz, Lindsay) (Filed on 11/7/2011) (Entered: 11/07/2 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA Bar No. 88500)
john.grenfell@pillsburylaw.com
JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA Bar No. 209134)
jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com
FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice)
fusae.nara@pillsburylaw.com
ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479)
andrew.lanphere@pillsburylaw.com
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 983-1000
Facsimile: (415) 983-1200
Attorneys for Defendants
SHARP CORPORATION and
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827
This Document Relates To:
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING SHARP’S TIME
TO ANSWER AMENDED
COMPLAINT
16
17
18
19
20
Case No. 2010-CV-3517 SI
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT
OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,
21
22
23
Plaintiff,
v.
AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
500932080v1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827
1
WHEREAS plaintiff State of Florida filed an Amended Complaint in the above-
2
captioned case against Defendants AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation
3
America, Chi Mei Innolux Corp., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA,
4
Inc., Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic
5
Devices (USA), Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America Inc., Samsung Electronics
6
Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sharp
7
Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display
8
Technology Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba America
9
Electronic Components, Inc. on April 13, 2011, Dkt. no. 2652;
10
WHEREAS Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation (together,
11
“Sharp”), jointly with other defendants in this action, filed a motion to dismiss the
12
Amended Complaint on May 20, 2011;
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS the Court denied defendants’ joint motion to dismiss the Amended
Complaint on September 15, 2011;
WHEREAS Sharp desires a reasonable amount of time to answer the Amended
Complaint;
WHEREAS the Court previously entered an Order extending the time to answer the
Amended Complaint on October 7, 2011, as stipulated by Plaintiff and Sharp; and
WHEREAS the requested time modification will not affect any other deadline in
this case.
THEREFORE, the State of Florida and Sharp hereby agree that Sharp’s deadline to
answer to the Amended Complaint shall be November 28, 2011.
Dated: November 7, 2011
24
25
26
27
28
-1500932080v1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827
1
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
2
By:
/s/ Nicholas J. Weilhammer
R. Scott Palmer
Lizabeth A. Brady
Nicholas J. Weilhammer (pro hac vice)
Office of the Attorney General
State of Florida
PL-01, The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
(850) 414-3300 (Phone)
(850) 488-9134 (Facsimile)
Nicholas.weilhammer@myfloridalegal.com
3
4
5
6
7
8
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
JOHN M. GRENFELL
JACOB R. SORENSEN
FUSAE NARA
ANDREW D. LANPHERE
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
9
10
11
12
13
By:
14
/s/ John M. Grenfell
John M. Grenfell
15
Attorneys for Defendants SHARP CORPORATION
and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
16
17
ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that the
18
concurrence of the other signatory hereto has been obtained.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: ______________
22
Honorable Susan Illston
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2500932080v1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?