Serrano v. Indymac Federal Bank, FSB et al

Filing 14

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY STAY SHOULD NOT BE LIFTED. Show Cause Response due by 3/11/2011. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/28/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2011)

Serrano v. Indymac Federal Bank, FSB et al

Doc. 14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 EVELIO SERRANO, Plaintiff, v. INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB, et al., Defendants. / 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On October 18, 2010, this Court issued an Order granting the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's motion to substitute in as receiver for Indymac Federal Bank, FSB, and stayed this matter for a period of ninety days. Although the Court denied as moot a motion for refund of filing fees filed by the FDIC, there has been no further activity since that time, and more than ninety days have now passed. Accordingly, the FDIC is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause as to why the stay should not be lifted. The FDIC's response shall be due by no later than March 11, 2011. If, after reviewing the FDIC's response, the Court believes a response from any other party is necessary, it shall issue a further order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 28, 2011 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE No. C 10-03522 JSW ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY STAY SHOULD NOT BE LIFTED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13

Dockets.Justia.com