Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1058

Minute Entry: Jury Trial held on 5/1/2012 before William Alsup (Date Filed: 5/1/2012). Jury Deliberations continued. Further Jury Trial set for 5/2/2012 8:00 AM. (Court Reporter Kathy Sullivan.) (dt, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 5/1/2012)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL TRIAL MINUTES The Honorable WILLIAM H. ALSUP Date: May 1, 2012 Case No.: C10-03561 WHA Case Name: ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. Plaintiff's Counsel: Michael Jacobs; Dan Muino; Fred Norton; Andrew Temkin; Steven Holtzman; Dorian Daley (Corporate Representative) Defendant's Counsel: Robert Van Nest; Christa Anderson; Dan Purcell; Michael Kwun; Bruce Baber Matthias Kamber; Catherine Lacavera (Corporate Representative) Clerk: Dawn K. Toland Court Reporter: Kathy Sullivan Trial Began: April 16, 2012 Further Trial: May 2, 2012 at 8:00 am Trial Motions Heard: 1. 2. 3. Other: Time in Trial:1 hour 2 minutes Disposition UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No: C10-03561 WHA Case Name: ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. EXHIBIT and WITNESS LIST JUDGE: WILLIAM H. ALSUP PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY: Michael Jacobs; Dan Muino Fred Norton; David Boies; Dorian Daley Steven Holtzman DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Robert Van Nest; Christa Anderson Dan Purcell; Michael Kwun Bruce Baber TRIAL DATE: May 1, 2012 REPORTER(S): Kathy Sullivan; Debra Pas CLERK: Dawn Toland PLF NO. DEF NO DATE OFFERED ID REC DESCRIPTION 8:00 am Jury Deliberation Continued 10:00 am Outside the presence of the jury. Court and counsel discussed two notes from the jury. Response will be given to the jury in open court. 10:42 am Reconvene...jury present 10:50 am Recess 10:50 am Outside the presence of the jury. Court and counsel discussed Phase II of the trial. 11:10 am Recess Deliberations ongoing 1:00 pm Recess until 5/2/12 at 8:00 am BY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?