Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1104

Declaration of DAVID ZIMMER in Support of #1036 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Oracle's Motion to Exclude Portions of Kearl Report filed byGoogle Inc.. (Related document(s) #1036 ) (Van Nest, Robert) (Filed on 5/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP ROBERT A. VAN NEST - # 84065 rvannest@kvn.com CHRISTA M. ANDERSON - # 184325 canderson@kvn.com DANIEL PURCELL - # 191424 dpurcell@kvn.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: 415 391 5400 Facsimile: 415 397 7188 KING & SPALDING LLP DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. - #112279 fzimmer@kslaw.com CHERYL A. SABNIS - #224323 csabnis@kslaw.com 101 Second Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: 415.318.1200 Fax: 415.318.1300 KING & SPALDING LLP SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice) sweingaertner@kslaw.com ROBERT F. PERRY rperry@kslaw.com BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice) 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Tel: 212.556.2100 Fax: 212.556.2222 IAN C. BALLON - #141819 ballon@gtlaw.com HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 meekerh@gtlaw.com GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 1900 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Tel: 650.328.8500 Fax: 650.328.8508 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 19 Plaintiff, 20 v. 21 GOOGLE INC., 22 23 Defendant. Case No. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA DECLARATION OF DAVID ZIMMER IN SUPPORT OF ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS TO MEREDITH DEARBORN’S DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE PORTIONS OF THE RULE 706 EXPERT REPORT OF DR. JAMES KEARL [DKT NO. 1036] 24 25 Dept.: Judge: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor Hon. William Alsup 26 27 28 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SEAL [DKT. NO. 1036] Case No. 3:10-CV-03561 WHA 663157.01 1 2 I, DAVID ZIMMER, declare as follows: 1. I am an associate with the law firm of Keker & Van Nest LLP, counsel to Google 3 Inc. (“Google”) in the present case. I submit this declaration in support of Oracle America, Inc.’s 4 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Exhibits to Meredith Dearborn’s Declaration in 5 Support of Oracle America, Inc.’s Motion to Exclude Portions of the Rule 706 Expert Report of 6 Dr. James Kearl [Dkt. No1036]. I have knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and if called to 7 testify as a witness thereto could do so competently under oath. 8 9 2. Certain of the redacted portions of Oracle’s Motion to Exclude Portions of the Rule 706 Expert Report of Dr. James R. Kearl [Dkt. No. 1037] contain sensitive, non-public 10 information about Google’s financial management practices and methodologies. This includes 11 the redacted material at: 4:9-10, 4:13-17, 4:21-23, 5:4-11, 5:15-23, 5:25-28, 6:1-14, 6:16-26, 12 7:10-11, and 7:13-18. Public release of this information would cause great and undue harm to 13 Google. The Court has previously granted Google’s request to seal this information. See, e.g., 14 Dkt. No. 1056. These selections should therefore be filed under seal. 15 3. Exhibit A to the Declaration of Meredith Dearborn In Support of Oracle America, 16 Inc.’s Motion to Exclude Portions of the Rule 706 Expert Report of Dr. James Kearl (“Dearborn 17 Decl.”) [Dkt. No. 1038] contains a short selection from the Expert Report of Dr. Alan J. Cox. 18 This selection includes Google’s sensitive, non-public financial data, such as costs, revenues, and 19 profits associated with Android. Public release of this information would cause great and undue 20 harm to Google. The Court has previously granted Google’s request to file under seal similar 21 selections from Dr. Cox’s report, see, e.g., Dkt. No. 935, as well as this type of financial 22 information more generally, see, e.g., Dkt. No. 1056. This exhibit should therefore be filed under 23 seal in its entirety. 24 4. Exhibit B to the Dearborn Decl. contains selections from the deposition of Andy 25 Rubin regarding Google’s accounting practices. Certain parts of Exhibit B contain sensitive, non- 26 public information about Google’s financial management practices and methodologies. This 27 includes the material at 8:5-9:5, 10:20-12:9, 13:3-15:12, 16:8-25, 21:2-24, 22:7-10, 22:15-17, 28 22:24-24:25, 29:5-32:25, 49:1-56:25, 61:1-4, 61:13-64:16, and 73:1-76:1. Public release of this 1 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SEAL [DKT. NO. 1036] Case No. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA 663157.01 1 information would cause great and undue harm to Google. The Court has previously granted 2 Google’s request to seal this information. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 1056. These selections should 3 therefore be filed under seal. 4 5 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed at San Francisco, California on May 8, 2012. 6 7 By: /s/ David Zimmer DAVID ZIMMER 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SEAL [DKT. NO. 1036] Case No. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA 663157.01

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?