Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1111
Statement Google Comments on the Court's Description of Java Language Principles by Google Inc.. (Baber, Bruce) (Filed on 5/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST - # 84065
rvannest@kvn.com
CHRISTA M. ANDERSON - # 184325
canderson@kvn.com
DANIEL PURCELL - # 191424
dpurcell@kvn.com
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188
KING & SPALDING LLP
DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. - #112279
fzimmer@kslaw.com
CHERYL A. SABNIS - #224323
csabnis@kslaw.com
101 Second Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: 415.318.1200
Fax: 415.318.1300
KING & SPALDING LLP
SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER
(Pro Hac Vice)
sweingaertner@kslaw.com
ROBERT F. PERRY
rperry@kslaw.com
BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice)
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Tel: 212.556.2100
Fax: 212.556.2222
IAN C. BALLON - #141819
ballon@gtlaw.com
HEATHER MEEKER - #172148
meekerh@gtlaw.com
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
1900 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Tel: 650.328.8500
Fax: 650.328.8508
13
14
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
19
Plaintiff,
20
v.
21
GOOGLE INC.,
22
Case No. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA
GOOGLE’S COMMENTS ON THE
COURT’S DESCRIPTION OF JAVA
LANGUAGE PRINCIPLES
Dept.:
Judge:
Courtroom 8, 19th Floor
Hon. William Alsup
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
GOOGLE’S COMMENTS ON THE COURT’S DESCRIPTION OF JAVA LANGUAGE PRINCIPLES
Case No. 3:10-CV-03561 WHA
663495.01
1
2
3
Google provides the following comments on the Court’s draft description of Java
language principles. All of Google’s comments are in the nature of minor corrections to the
Court’s text or correction of typographical errors:
4
Page 1, line 1: “Java punctuation” should be changed to “Java syntax”
5
6
Page 1, lines 4-5: “each statement being a single command” should be changed to “each
statement being one or more commands”
7
8
9
Page 1, line 17: “output(s)” should be changed to “output”; “are” should be changed to
“is”; and “return(s)” should be changed to “return” – so the sentence should read “The output
from the method is known as the return.”
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Page 2, line 11: “method body mut [sic] have” should be changed to “method body must
have”
Page 2, line 17: “Java” should be changed to “J2SE”
Page 3, line 2: “patent class” should be changed to “parent class”
Page 3, line 11: the final curly bracket should be facing in the opposite direction – it
should be a close bracket rather than an open bracket.
Google does not propose any additions to the Court’s description.
Google has received through the CM-ECF system Oracle’s suggested changes to the
Court’s draft. (Dkt. 1110). Google will review Oracle’s suggestions and will be prepared to
comment on them tomorrow morning.
20
21
Dated: May 9, 2012
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
22
By:
/s/ Robert A. Van Nest
ROBERT A. VAN NEST
23
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.
24
25
26
27
28
1
GOOGLE’S COMMENTS ON THE COURT’S DESCRIPTION OF JAVA LANGUAGE PRINCIPLES
Case No. 3:10-CV-03561 WHA
663495.01
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?