Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1111

Statement Google Comments on the Court's Description of Java Language Principles by Google Inc.. (Baber, Bruce) (Filed on 5/9/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST - # 84065
[e-mail]
CHRISTA M. ANDERSON - # 184325
[e-mail]
DANIEL PURCELL - # 191424
[e-mail]
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188

KING & SPALDING LLP
DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. - #112279
[e-mail]
CHERYL A. SABNIS - #224323
[e-mail]
101 Second Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

KING & SPALDING LLP
SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER
(Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
ROBERT F. PERRY
[e-mail]
BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice)
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

IAN C. BALLON - #141819
[e-mail]
HEATHER MEEKER - #172148
[e-mail]
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
1900 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

13
14

Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

19

Plaintiff,

20

v.

21

GOOGLE INC.,

22

Case No. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA
GOOGLE’S COMMENTS ON THE
COURT’S DESCRIPTION OF JAVA
LANGUAGE PRINCIPLES
Dept.:
Judge:

Courtroom 8, 19th Floor
Hon. William Alsup

Defendant.

23
24
25
26
27
28
GOOGLE’S COMMENTS ON THE COURT’S DESCRIPTION OF JAVA LANGUAGE PRINCIPLES
Case No. 3:10-CV-03561 WHA
663495.01

1
2
3

Google provides the following comments on the Court’s draft description of Java
language principles. All of Google’s comments are in the nature of minor corrections to the
Court’s text or correction of typographical errors:

4

Page 1, line 1: “Java punctuation” should be changed to “Java syntax”

5
6

Page 1, lines 4-5: “each statement being a single command” should be changed to “each
statement being one or more commands”

7
8
9

Page 1, line 17: “output(s)” should be changed to “output”; “are” should be changed to
“is”; and “return(s)” should be changed to “return” – so the sentence should read “The output
from the method is known as the return.”

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Page 2, line 11: “method body mut [sic] have” should be changed to “method body must
have”
Page 2, line 17: “Java” should be changed to “J2SE”
Page 3, line 2: “patent class” should be changed to “parent class”
Page 3, line 11: the final curly bracket should be facing in the opposite direction – it
should be a close bracket rather than an open bracket.
Google does not propose any additions to the Court’s description.
Google has received through the CM-ECF system Oracle’s suggested changes to the
Court’s draft. (Dkt. 1110). Google will review Oracle’s suggestions and will be prepared to
comment on them tomorrow morning.

20
21

Dated: May 9, 2012

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

22
By:

/s/ Robert A. Van Nest
ROBERT A. VAN NEST

23
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

24
25
26
27
28
1

GOOGLE’S COMMENTS ON THE COURT’S DESCRIPTION OF JAVA LANGUAGE PRINCIPLES
Case No. 3:10-CV-03561 WHA
663495.01