Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1129
MOTION TO ADMIT STATEMENT FROM GOOGLES INTERROGATORY RESPONSE filed by Oracle America, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 5/14/2012 07:30 AM before Hon. William Alsup. Responses due by 5/13/2012. (Holtzman, Steven) (Filed on 5/13/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B O I E S ,
S C H I L L E R
&
F L E X N E R
L L P
B O I E S ,
S C H I L L E R
&
F L E X N E R
L L P
O A K L A N D ,
C A L I F O R N I A
O A K L A N D ,
C A L I F O R N I A
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725)
mdpeters@mofo.com
DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624)
dmuino@mofo.com
755 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018
Telephone: (650) 813-5600 / Facsimile: (650) 494-0792
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
dboies@bsfllp.com
333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone: (914) 749-8200 / Facsimile: (914) 749-8300
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177)
sholtzman@bsfllp.com
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900, Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 874-1000 / Facsimile: (510) 874-1460
ALANNA RUTHERFORD (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
575 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022
Telephone: (212) 446-2300 / Facsimile: (212) 446-2350 (fax)
ORACLE CORPORATION
DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049)
dorian.daley@oracle.com
DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527)
deborah.miller@oracle.com
MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600)
matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com
500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 506-5200 / Facsimile: (650) 506-7114
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
22
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA
23
Plaintiff,
24
v.
25
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION TO
ADMIT STATEMENT FROM GOOGLE’S
INTERROGATORY RESPONSE
GOOGLE, INC.
26
Defendant.
Dept.: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor
Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup
27
28
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION RE GOOGLE’S INTERROGATORY RESPONSE
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
1
Oracle America, Inc. hereby moves to have deemed admitted and read to the jury the
2
following statement from Google’s response to one of Oracle’s interrogatories: “Google states that
3
any financial data relating to mobile platforms from prior to January 2009 that it may have
4
maintained are inaccurate and unreliable.”
5
Google made this statement in response to an interrogatory seeking information regarding
H I L L E R
&
L E R
&
F L E
A N D ,
C A L I
,
C A L I F O R
C
L
L
D
B O I E S ,
S
B O I E S ,
S C H I
O A K
O A K L A N
the revenues and profits associated with Android during the period January 2005 through
7
F L E X N E R
L L P
X N E R
L L P
F O R N I A
N I A
6
December 2011. In its response, Google identified a number of documents reflecting Android
8
revenues and expenses, including substantial expenses purportedly incurred before January 2009.
9
Google designated that response confidential, and Oracle will be prepared to hand up a copy of the
10
11
response in court.
Google’s statement is relevant to the jury’s assessment of infringer’s profits in Phase 3. If
12
Google is permitted to deduct any expenses related to the generation of Android revenues or the
13
use of the infringing material, its deduction should be limited to expenses incurred during periods
14
for which Google has reliable and accurate data. Because the report of Google’s expert, Dr. Cox,
15
deducts expenses for prior to January 2009, the jury is entitled to hear that Google admitted during
16
discovery that the calculation of those expenses was inaccurate and unreliable.
17
Google’s interrogatory response is admissible against Google under Rule 33(c) of the
18
Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, which provides: “An answer to an interrogatory may be used to
19
the extent allowed by the Federal Rules of Evidence.” Written interrogatory responses are party
20
admissions, and therefore admissible under Rule 801(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
21
22
The Court should hold Google to its interrogatory response and deem the statement set
forth above admitted.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 13, 2012
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
By: _/s/ Steven C. Holtzman____
Steven C. Holtzman
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
1
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION RE GOOGLE’S INTERROGATORY RESPONSE
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?