Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1159

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES re #1158 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Copyright Damages filed by Google Inc. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 5/16/12. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 [counsel listed on signature page] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 ORACLE AMERICA, INC. Case No. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. GOOGLE INC. Honorable Judge William Alsup STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CIV. NO. CV 10-03561-WHA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties stipulate and agree as follows: 1. result of the rangeCheck code and the decompiled files that were the subject of questions 3.A and 3.B of the phase one jury verdict (the “Copied Materials”) shall be deferred in accordance with this stipulation. 2. an assessment and award of monetary relief, then: A. 13 14 15 16 B. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Oracle shall be free to seek from the Future Jury monetary relief in the form of profits for the infringement arising as a result of the Copied Materials, but only to the extent such profits are not taken into account in computing any actual damages or profits sought for infringement of the SSO; provided, however, that nothing herein shall require Oracle to allocate its actual damages and/or profits claimed between the SSO and the Copied Materials; and 17 18 Proceedings with respect to the SSO Claim will be bifurcated, i.e., liability will be tried separately from willfulness and damages; 11 12 In the event that Oracle’s claim based on the SSO of the 37 accused API packages or any portion thereof (the “SSO Claim”) is ultimately submitted to a jury (the “Future Jury”) for 9 10 The assessment and award of monetary relief, if any, for infringement arising as a C. In the event Oracle seeks profits arising as a result of the Copied Materials in such a future damages phase, neither party may use any expert opinions or reports or other evidence that they could not have used in the event such claim for profits was tried before the current jury. 3. In the event that no portion of Oracle’s SSO Claim is submitted to a future jury for an assessment and award of monetary relief, then: A. The parties waive their right to a jury trial on the issue of monetary relief if any, for infringement arising as a result of the Copied Materials; B. Oracle waives any claim for actual damages or profits for such infringement; and C. The Court will set an amount of statutory damages for such infringement 28 1 STIPULATION REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CIV. NO. CV 10-03561-WHA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 in accordance with 17 U.S.C. § 504(c). 4. Nothing contained in this stipulation shall impair or adversely affect in any way the rights of the parties to raise in any appeal any and all issues relating to the Copied Materials; for the avoidance of doubt and without limiting in any way the generality of the foregoing, such rights of appeal shall include, among other issues: (a) issues relating to the definitions of “work as a whole” that formed part of the instructions to the current jury and/or whether use of the rangeCheck code or the decompiled files was de minimis as a matter of law and (b) issues relating to the amounts of any damages (including statutory damages) awarded in accordance with the procedures set forth above. 5. In the event the current jury returns a verdict finding infringement as to any claim of the 104 Patent or the 520 Patent, the parties shall proceed in accordance with the stipulations previously entered into between the parties. 13 14 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER 16 17 The foregoing stipulation is approved, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 Date: May 16, 2012 Honorable William Alsup Judge, United States District Court 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CIV. NO. CV 10-03561-WHA 1 DATED: May 16, 2012 KING & SPALDING LLP 2 By: /s/ Bruce W. Baber 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice) sweingaertner@kslaw.com ROBERT F. PERRY rperry@kslaw.com BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice) bbaber@kslaw.com 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065) rvannest@kvn.com CHRISTA M. ANDERSON (SBN 184325) canderson@kvn.com DANIEL PURCELL (SBN 191424) dpurcell@kvn.com KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CIV. NO. CV 10-03561-WHA 1 Dated: May 16, 2012 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 2 By: /s/ Steven C. Holtzman 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) dboies@bsfllp.com 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177) sholtzman@bsfllp.com FRED NORTON (Bar No. 224725) fnorton@bsfllp.com 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725) mdpeters@mofo.com DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624) dmuino@mofo.com 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 ORACLE CORPORATION DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049) dorian.daley@oracle.com DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527) deborah.miller@oracle.com MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600) matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 506-5200 Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 27 28 4 STIPULATION REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CIV. NO. CV 10-03561-WHA ATTESTATION 1 2 I, Bruce W. Baber, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 STIPULATION RE INDIRECT PATENT INFRINGEMENT. In compliance with General 4 Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Steven C. Holtzman has concurred in this filing. 5 6 Date: May 16, 2012 /s/ Bruce W. Baber BRUCE W. BABER 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CIV. NO. CV 10-03561-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?