Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1174
Minute Entry: Jury Trial held on 5/9/2012 before William Alsup (Date Filed: 5/9/2012). Witnesses Called. Rule 50 Motions argued. Further Jury Trial set for 5/10/2012 7:30 AM. (Court Reporter Kathy Sullivan; Debra Pas.) (dt, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 5/9/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL TRIAL MINUTES
The Honorable WILLIAM H. ALSUP
Date: May 9, 2012
Case No.: C10-03561 WHA
Case Name: ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. GOOGLE INC.
Plaintiff's Counsel: Michael Jacobs; Dan Muino; Fred Norton; Andrew Temkin; David Boies
Steven Holtzman; Dorian Daley; Safra Catz (Corporate Representative)
Defendant's Counsel: Robert Van Nest; Christa Anderson; Dan Purcell; Eugene Paige; Scott Weingaertner
Matthias Kamber; Renny Hwang; Catherine Lacavera (Corporate Representative)
Clerk: Dawn K. Toland
Court Reporter: Kathy Sullivan; Debra Pas
Trial Began: April 16, 2012
Further Trial: May 10, 2012 at 7:30 am
Trial Motions Heard:
1.
2.
3.
Other:
Time in Trial: 7 hours 30 minutes
Disposition
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No: C10-03561 WHA
Case Name: ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. GOOGLE INC.
EXHIBIT and WITNESS LIST
JUDGE:
WILLIAM H. ALSUP
PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY:
Michael Jacobs; Dan Muino
Fred Norton; David Boies; Dorian Daley
Steven Holtzman; Ken Kuwayti
DEFENSE ATTORNEY:
Robert Van Nest; Christa Anderson
Dan Purcell; Michael Kwun
Bruce Baber
TRIAL DATE:
May 9, 2012
REPORTER(S):
Kathy Sullivan; Debra Pas
CLERK:
Dawn Toland
PLF
NO.
DEF
NO
DATE
OFFERED
ID
REC
DESCRIPTION
7:30 am
Outside the presence of the jury. Plaintiff provided
demonstrative exhibits 1129 and 1130. Exhibits 5 and 971
were received into evidence
7:54 am
Reconvene...jury present
Direct of Andy Rubin continued
20
x
219
x
x
Email from Steve Horowitz to Leslie Hawthorn re Nedim
Email from Andy Rubin to Alan Eustace re Hiroshi project
7:56 am
Cross Examination by Christa Anderson
155
x
x
Email from Greg Stein to Andy Rubin re [Opensource-team]
2714
x
x
Email from Vineet Gupta to Andy Rubin re Re: Hy
616
x
x
Email from Vineet Gupta to Alan Brenner
20
x
x
Email from Steve Horowitz to Leslie Hawthorn re Nedim
22
x
x
Email from Karen Tsay to deal_review@google.com
8:18 am
230
Redirect Examination
x
x
Email from Andy Rubin to Bob Lee
8:27 am
Recross Examination
8:30 am
Re-Redirect Examination
8:31 am
Re-Recross Examination
8:31 am
Witness Excused
Video Deposition of Andy Rubin
155
x
x
Email from Greg Stein to Andy Rubin re [Opensource-team]
BY
230
x
x
8:55 am
Email from Steve Horowitz to Leslie Hawthorn re Nedim
Plaintiff’s witness Andy McFadden sworn-in. Direct by
Michael Jacobs
294
x
x
McFadden PDB snippets
955
x
x
Resume of Andrew T. McFadden
292
x
x
Self-assessment from 1/1/07 through 8/31/07
302
x
x
Email from hr-help@google.com to Andrew McFadden
737
x
x
Exhibit AB
735
x
x
Exhibit Z
47.1
x
x
Gingerbread:\dalvik\vm\analysis
301
x
x
Email from Andy McFadden to Androidperformance@google.com
9:22 am
Recess
9:47 am
Reconvene...jury present
46.1
4
x
x
Froyo:\dalvik\vm\analysis
47.6
x
x
Gingerbread:\dalvik\vm\oo\Resolve:c
739
x
x
Exhibit AG
27
x
x
All weekly snippets from Andy McFadden
258
x
x
Email from Andy McFadden to Jason Parks
10:22 am
Cross Examination by Matthias Kamber
10:27 am
Redirect
10:30 am
Witness Excused
10:33 am
Plaintiff’s witness Brian Sutphin sworn-in. Direct by Michael
Jacobs
10:40 am
Cross Examination by Robert Van Nest
971
x
x
10:49 am
971
Sun Microsystems, inc. For 10-K for the year ending 6/30/08
Redirect Examination
x
x
10:50 am
Sun Microsystems, inc. For 10-K for the year ending 6/30/08
Witness Excused
Plaintiff’s Witness Professor John Mitchell sworn-in. Direct
by Michael Jacobs
4015
x
x
Patent 104
11:43 am
Recess
12:02 pm
Reconvene...jury present
Direct of Professor John Mitchell continued
1:00 pm
Jury Recess until 5/10/12
1:45 pm
Outside the presence of the jury. Court requested chart of
methods that are expressly declared. Parties argued the rule 50
motions.
3:45 pm
Recess until 5/10/12 at 7:30 am
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?