Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1174

Minute Entry: Jury Trial held on 5/9/2012 before William Alsup (Date Filed: 5/9/2012). Witnesses Called. Rule 50 Motions argued. Further Jury Trial set for 5/10/2012 7:30 AM. (Court Reporter Kathy Sullivan; Debra Pas.) (dt, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 5/9/2012)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL TRIAL MINUTES The Honorable WILLIAM H. ALSUP Date: May 9, 2012 Case No.: C10-03561 WHA Case Name: ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. Plaintiff's Counsel: Michael Jacobs; Dan Muino; Fred Norton; Andrew Temkin; David Boies Steven Holtzman; Dorian Daley; Safra Catz (Corporate Representative) Defendant's Counsel: Robert Van Nest; Christa Anderson; Dan Purcell; Eugene Paige; Scott Weingaertner Matthias Kamber; Renny Hwang; Catherine Lacavera (Corporate Representative) Clerk: Dawn K. Toland Court Reporter: Kathy Sullivan; Debra Pas Trial Began: April 16, 2012 Further Trial: May 10, 2012 at 7:30 am Trial Motions Heard: 1. 2. 3. Other: Time in Trial: 7 hours 30 minutes Disposition UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No: C10-03561 WHA Case Name: ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. EXHIBIT and WITNESS LIST JUDGE: WILLIAM H. ALSUP PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY: Michael Jacobs; Dan Muino Fred Norton; David Boies; Dorian Daley Steven Holtzman; Ken Kuwayti DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Robert Van Nest; Christa Anderson Dan Purcell; Michael Kwun Bruce Baber TRIAL DATE: May 9, 2012 REPORTER(S): Kathy Sullivan; Debra Pas CLERK: Dawn Toland PLF NO. DEF NO DATE OFFERED ID REC DESCRIPTION 7:30 am Outside the presence of the jury. Plaintiff provided demonstrative exhibits 1129 and 1130. Exhibits 5 and 971 were received into evidence 7:54 am Reconvene...jury present Direct of Andy Rubin continued 20 x 219 x x Email from Steve Horowitz to Leslie Hawthorn re Nedim Email from Andy Rubin to Alan Eustace re Hiroshi project 7:56 am Cross Examination by Christa Anderson 155 x x Email from Greg Stein to Andy Rubin re [Opensource-team] 2714 x x Email from Vineet Gupta to Andy Rubin re Re: Hy 616 x x Email from Vineet Gupta to Alan Brenner 20 x x Email from Steve Horowitz to Leslie Hawthorn re Nedim 22 x x Email from Karen Tsay to deal_review@google.com 8:18 am 230 Redirect Examination x x Email from Andy Rubin to Bob Lee 8:27 am Recross Examination 8:30 am Re-Redirect Examination 8:31 am Re-Recross Examination 8:31 am Witness Excused Video Deposition of Andy Rubin 155 x x Email from Greg Stein to Andy Rubin re [Opensource-team] BY 230 x x 8:55 am Email from Steve Horowitz to Leslie Hawthorn re Nedim Plaintiff’s witness Andy McFadden sworn-in. Direct by Michael Jacobs 294 x x McFadden PDB snippets 955 x x Resume of Andrew T. McFadden 292 x x Self-assessment from 1/1/07 through 8/31/07 302 x x Email from hr-help@google.com to Andrew McFadden 737 x x Exhibit AB 735 x x Exhibit Z 47.1 x x Gingerbread:\dalvik\vm\analysis 301 x x Email from Andy McFadden to Androidperformance@google.com 9:22 am Recess 9:47 am Reconvene...jury present 46.1 4 x x Froyo:\dalvik\vm\analysis 47.6 x x Gingerbread:\dalvik\vm\oo\Resolve:c 739 x x Exhibit AG 27 x x All weekly snippets from Andy McFadden 258 x x Email from Andy McFadden to Jason Parks 10:22 am Cross Examination by Matthias Kamber 10:27 am Redirect 10:30 am Witness Excused 10:33 am Plaintiff’s witness Brian Sutphin sworn-in. Direct by Michael Jacobs 10:40 am Cross Examination by Robert Van Nest 971 x x 10:49 am 971 Sun Microsystems, inc. For 10-K for the year ending 6/30/08 Redirect Examination x x 10:50 am Sun Microsystems, inc. For 10-K for the year ending 6/30/08 Witness Excused Plaintiff’s Witness Professor John Mitchell sworn-in. Direct by Michael Jacobs 4015 x x Patent 104 11:43 am Recess 12:02 pm Reconvene...jury present Direct of Professor John Mitchell continued 1:00 pm Jury Recess until 5/10/12 1:45 pm Outside the presence of the jury. Court requested chart of methods that are expressly declared. Parties argued the rule 50 motions. 3:45 pm Recess until 5/10/12 at 7:30 am

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?