Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1188
REQUEST FOR BRIEFING ON SONY V. CONNECTIX re #1181 Order. Signed by Judge Alsup on May 23, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
REQUEST FOR BRIEFING ON
SONY V. CONNECTIX
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
/
15
16
No. C 10-03561 WHA
In the reply briefs due tomorrow at noon, please address the following question: In Sony
17
Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp., 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000), what did the
18
accused infringer Connectix ultimately duplicate to allow desktops to run Playstation games?
19
For example, was it application binary interfaces (if so, be specific and use examples as to what
20
this would have included)? Was it names that would have been in the source code of the
21
Playstation BIOS?
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 23, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?