Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1210

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #1159 Stipulation and Order (Second) Regarding Copyright Damages filed by Oracle America, Inc.. (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 6/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 [counsel listed on signature page] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 GOOGLE INC. 15 Defendant. Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES Dept.: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3160618 1 2 STIPULATION WHEREAS, the parties previously entered into a stipulation, approved by the Court (ECF 3 1159), regarding damages, if any, related to Google’s infringement of Oracle’s copyrights in 4 connection with (1) the rangeCheck code in TimSort.java and ComparableTimSort.java, and 5 (2) the eight decompiled files (seven “Impl.java” files and one “ACL” file) (collectively, the 6 “Copied Materials”); 7 WHEREAS, Section 3.C of the prior stipulation provides that the Court will set an amount 8 of statutory damages for Google’s infringement in connection with the Copied Materials if 9 Oracle’s copyright claim based on the accused 37 Java API packages (the “SSO Claim”) is not 10 11 12 submitted to a future jury; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to modify the prior stipulation in certain respects to facilitate entry of a final, appealable judgment in this action; 13 NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows: 14 1. The Court may enter an award of statutory damages under Section 3.C of the prior 15 stipulation (ECF 1159) of $0, and can enter statutory damages of $0 in the final judgment in 16 connection with the Copied Materials only. 17 2. Other than as stated above, this stipulation will not alter the terms of the prior 18 stipulation (ECF 1159). For the avoidance of doubt, the parties reaffirm that paragraph 2 of the 19 prior stipulation shall govern in the event that the SSO Claim or any portion thereof is ultimately 20 submitted to a trier-of-fact for an assessment and award of monetary relief. 21 3. The amount of statutory damages set in Paragraph 1 shall not be used to support an 22 argument that a party is or is not the “prevailing party” for purposes of allocating costs, nor shall 23 it be used to support an argument that the award is outside the range permitted by 17 U.S.C. 24 § 504(c). 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3160618 1 1 ORDER 2 The foregoing stipulation is approved, and IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Date: 5 Honorable William Alsup Judge of the United States District Court 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3160618 2 1 Dated: June 20, 2012 2 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs 3 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com KENNETH A. KUWAYTI (Bar No. 145384) kkuwayti@mofo.com MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725) mdpeters@mofo.com DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624) dmuino@mofo.com 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) dboies@bsfllp.com 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177) sholtzman@bsfllp.com 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORACLE CORPORATION DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049) dorian.daley@oracle.com DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527) deborah.miller@oracle.com MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600) matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 506-5200 Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3160618 3 1 Dated: June 20, 2012 2 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP By: __/s/ Robert A. Van Nest 3 ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065) rvannest@kvn.com CHRISTA M. ANDERSON (SBN184325) canderson@kvn.com DANIEL PURCELL (SBN 191424) dpurcell@kvn.com 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 4 5 6 7 8 9 SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice) sweingaertner@kslaw.com ROBERT F. PERRY rperry@kslaw.com BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice) bbaber@kslaw.com 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 10 11 12 13 14 DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (SBN 112279) fzimmer@kslaw.com CHERYL A. SABNIS (SBN 224323) csabnis@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 101 Second Street - Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 318-1200 Facsimile: (415) 318-1300 15 16 17 18 19 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP IAN C. BALLON (SBN 141819) ballon@gtlaw.com HEATHER MEEKER (SBN 172148) meekerh@gtlaw.com 1900 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 328-8500 Facsimile: (650) 328-8508 20 21 22 23 24 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3160618 4 1 ATTESTATION 2 3 4 5 I, Michael A. Jacobs, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Robert A. Van Nest has concurred in this filing. 6 7 8 Date: June 20, 2012 /s/ Michael A. Jacobs 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING COPYRIGHT DAMAGES CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR) sf-3160618 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?