Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1223

Proposed Order re #1222 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Portions of Count VIII of Oracle's Amended Complaint, or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial by Google Inc.. (Van Nest, Robert) (Filed on 7/17/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065
[e-mail]
CHRISTA M. ANDERSON - #184325
[e-mail]
DANIEL PURCELL - #191424
[e-mail]
710 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

KING & SPALDING LLP
SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
ROBERT F. PERRY
[e-mail]
BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-4003
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

KING & SPALDING LLP
DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. - #112279
[e-mail]
CHERYL A. SABNIS - #224323
[e-mail]
101 Second Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
IAN C. BALLON - #141819
[e-mail]
HEATHER MEEKER - #172148
[e-mail]
1900 University Avenue, Fifth Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

13
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

20

Case No. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA
Plaintiff,

21

v.

22

Honorable Judge William Alsup

GOOGLE INC.,

23

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
GOOGLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 50(b)
JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON
PORTIONS OF COUNT VIII OF
ORACLE’S AMENDED COMPLAINT,
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A
NEW TRIAL

Defendant.

24
25
26
27
28

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 50(b) JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF
LAW ON PORTIONS OF COUNT VIII OF ORACLE’S AMENDED COMPLAINT, OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR A NEW TRIAL
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA

1
Before this Court is Google Inc.’s Motion for Rule 50(b) Judgment as a Matter of Law on
2
Portions of Count VIII of Oracle’s Amended Complaint, or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial.
3
Based on the motion, the memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof, the pleadings
4
on file, any evidence or argument presented at a hearing, and any other relevant matter, Google’s
5
Motion for Rule 50(b) Judgment as a Matter of Law on Portions of Count VIII of Oracle’s
6
Amended Complaint is GRANTED.
7
[Alternatively, Google’s Motion for a New Trial on Portions of Count VIII of Oracle’s
8
Amended Complaint is GRANTED]
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
Dated:
14
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 50(b) JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF
LAW ON PORTIONS OF COUNT VIII OF ORACLE’S AMENDED COMPLAINT, OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, FOR A NEW TRIAL
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA