Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1242
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND NEW TRIAL by Hon. William Alsup denying #1222 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 10-03561 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER
OF LAW AND NEW TRIAL
GOOGLE INC.,
13
Defendant.
/
14
15
Defendant Google Inc. moves for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b), or in the
16
alternative, for a new trial under Rule 59, on copyright issues regarding the rangeCheck function
17
and decompiled files. Google’s arguments are repetitive of its Rule 50(a) motion and rely on the
18
same evidence. For reasons stated in the prior orders (Dkt. Nos. 1119, 1123), Google’s motion
19
is DENIED.
20
The Court takes this opportunity to state that it will take no further action regarding the
21
subject of payments by the litigants to commentators and journalists and reassures both sides that
22
no commentary has in any way influenced the Court’s orders and ruling herein save and except
23
for any treatise or article expressly cited in an order or ruling.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: September 4, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?