Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1253
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED STAY OF EXECUTION OF COSTS by Hon. William Alsup granting #1252 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2012)
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page1 of 6
1
[counsel listed on signature page]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
GOOGLE INC.
15
Defendant.
Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF
COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL
Dept.: Courtroom 9, 19th Floor
Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
sf-3202204
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page2 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, on September 4, 2012, the Court awarded costs to Google in the amount of
$1,130,320 (“Costs Award”) (ECF 1241 at 5);
WHEREAS, on October 3, 2012, Oracle filed a Notice of Appeal from the Final Judgment
entered by the Court on June 20, 2012 (ECF 1211);
6
WHEREAS, Oracle desires to stay execution of the Costs Award pending appeal,
7
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d), and seeks a waiver of the requirement that it post a supersedeas
8
bond; and
9
WHEREAS, Google is agreeable to staying execution of the Costs Award pending appeal
10
and agrees to waive the requirement that Oracle post a supersedeas bond, provided that Oracle
11
pay the Costs Award with post-judgment interest, provided the Costs Award has not been
12
overturned, at the exhaustion of all appellate proceedings;
13
NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows:
14
1.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d), execution of the costs awarded by this Court on
15
September 4, 2012, shall be stayed pending appeal from the Final Judgment of June 20, 2012. By
16
agreement of the parties, Oracle is not required to post a supersedeas bond.
17
18
2.
Provided the Costs Award has not been overturned, at the exhaustion of all
appellate proceedings Oracle shall pay that award with post-judgment interest.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
sf-3202204
1
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page3 of 6
1
2
3
4
ORDER
The foregoing stipulation is approved, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: October 15, 2012.
5
Honorable William Alsup
Judge of the United States District Court
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
sf-3202204
2
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page4 of 6
1
Dated: October 15, 2012
2
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs
3
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
KENNETH A. KUWAYTI (Bar No. 145384)
kkuwayti@mofo.com
MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725)
mdpeters@mofo.com
DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624)
dmuino@mofo.com
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018
Telephone: (650) 813-5600
Facsimile: (650) 494-0792
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
dboies@bsfllp.com
333 Main Street
Armonk, NY 10504
Telephone: (914) 749-8200
Facsimile: (914) 749-8300
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177)
sholtzman@bsfllp.com
1999 Harrison St., Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 874-1000
Facsimile: (510) 874-1460
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORACLE CORPORATION
DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049)
dorian.daley@oracle.com
DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527)
deborah.miller@oracle.com
MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No.
211600)
matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood City, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 506-5200
Facsimile: (650) 506-7114
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
sf-3202204
3
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page5 of 6
1
Dated: October 15, 2012
2
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP
By: __/s/ Robert A. Van Nest
3
ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065)
rvannest@kvn.com
CHRISTA M. ANDERSON (SBN184325)
canderson@kvn.com
DANIEL PURCELL (SBN 191424)
dpurcell@kvn.com
710 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
Telephone: (415) 391-5400
Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
4
5
6
7
8
9
SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice)
sweingaertner@kslaw.com
ROBERT F. PERRY
rperry@kslaw.com
BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice)
bbaber@kslaw.com
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-4003
Telephone: (212) 556-2100
Facsimile: (212) 556-2222
10
11
12
13
14
DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (SBN 112279)
fzimmer@kslaw.com
CHERYL A. SABNIS (SBN 224323)
csabnis@kslaw.com
KING & SPALDING LLP
101 Second Street - Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 318-1200
Facsimile: (415) 318-1300
15
16
17
18
19
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
IAN C. BALLON (SBN 141819)
ballon@gtlaw.com
HEATHER MEEKER (SBN 172148)
meekerh@gtlaw.com
1900 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: (650) 328-8500
Facsimile: (650) 328-8508
20
21
22
23
24
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
sf-3202204
4
Case3:10-cv-03561-WHA Document1252 Filed10/15/12 Page6 of 6
1
ATTESTATION
2
3
4
5
I, Michael A. Jacobs, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD
PENDING APPEAL. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Robert A.
Van Nest has concurred in this filing.
6
7
8
Date:
October 15, 2012
/s/ Michael A. Jacobs
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY EXECUTION OF COSTS AWARD PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA (DMR)
sf-3202204
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?