Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1718

ORDER RE TIMELINE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/22/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., ORDER RE TIMELINE Defendant. / 15 16 No. C 10-03561 WHA Counsel shall agree on a non-argumentative timeline to be handed to the jury that 17 includes eight to ten important dates. If you can’t agree on the eight to ten, then each side can 18 nominate four or five. This will be on a large poster board and a handout. It should show the 19 approximate time frame from 2005 to 2015 running left to right. The purpose is to give the jury 20 a quick reference to place events as emails and testimony are presented. Please bring this to the 21 final pretrial conference. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 22, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?