Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1718

ORDER RE TIMELINE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/22/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,

ORDER RE TIMELINE

Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 10-03561 WHA

Counsel shall agree on a non-argumentative timeline to be handed to the jury that

17

includes eight to ten important dates. If you can’t agree on the eight to ten, then each side can

18

nominate four or five. This will be on a large poster board and a handout. It should show the

19

approximate time frame from 2005 to 2015 running left to right. The purpose is to give the jury

20

a quick reference to place events as emails and testimony are presented. Please bring this to the

21

final pretrial conference.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: April 22, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE