Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1731

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN SCHWARTZ granting #1725 . Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/25/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
KAREN G. JOHNSON-MCKEWAN # 121570
[e-mail]
ANNETTE L. HURST # 148738
[e-mail]
GABRIEL M. RAMSEY # 209218
[e-mail]
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2669
Tel: [phone]/Fax: [phone]

6
7
8
9

PETER A. BICKS (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
LISA T. SIMPSON (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
51 West 52nd Street
New York, New York 10019-6142
Tel: [phone]/Fax: [phone]

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

ORACLE CORPORATION
DORIAN DALEY # 129049
[e-mail]
DEBORAH K. MILLER # 95527
[e-mail]
MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA # 211600
[e-mail]
RUCHIKA AGRAWAL # 246058
[e-mail]
500 Oracle Parkway
Redwood City, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]/Fax: [phone]

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST - # 84065
[e-mail]
CHRISTA M. ANDERSON - # 184325
[e-mail]
DANIEL PURCELL - # 191424
[e-mail]
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
KING & SPALDING LLP
BRUCE W. BABER (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys For Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20
21
22

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA

Plaintiff,

23

JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TESTIMONY
OF JONATHAN SCHWARTZ

24

v.

25

GOOGLE INC.,

26

Defendant.

Dept.:
Judge:

Courtroom 8, 19th Floor
Hon. William H. Alsup

27
28
JOINT STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE TESTIMONY OF J. SCHWARTZ
Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA

1

STIPULATION

2

WHEREAS Oracle filed a summary motion in limine seeking to exclude portions of

3

former Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz’s prior testimony from the retrial in this matter, ECF 1696 at

4

18;

5
6
7
8

WHEREAS Google filed a summary opposition opposing Oracle’s motion in limine, ECF
1696 at 19;
WHEREAS the Court ordered full briefing on Oracle’s summary motion in limine from
both parties, ECF 1723;

9

WHEREAS Oracle and Google (collectively the “Parties”) conferred and agreed that a

10

mutual stipulated agreement would resolve Oracle’s outstanding motion in limine without the

11

need for further motion practice;

12

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties AGREE AND STIPULATE that:

13
14

To resolve Oracle’s Summary Motion in Limine No. 8, ECF 1696 at 18, Google agrees

15

not to attempt to elicit from Mr. Schwartz or use at trial the testimony by Mr. Schwartz that “we

16

didn’t have any grounds” for litigation against Google over Android. If Oracle opens the door to

17

this testimony by asking Mr. Schwartz or any other witness whether Sun had legal grounds to sue

18

Google over Android, by presenting testimony (solicited or not) from any Oracle witness on this

19

issue, or through attorney argument, Google will thereafter not be limited by this agreement. If

20

Google believes the door has been opened to this issue, Google agrees to seek clearance from the

21

Court before attempting to use Mr. Schwartz’s prior testimony. Nothing in this agreement should

22

be read to limit Oracle or Google from presenting evidence or argument on any issue not

23

specifically identified herein.

24
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE TESTIMONY OF J. SCHWARTZ
Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA

1

Dated: April 25, 2016

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

2
3

By:

/s/ Peter A. Bicks
PETER A. BICKS

4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.

6
7

Dated: April 25, 2016

Keker & Van Nest LLP

8

By:

9

/s/ Robert A. Van Nest
ROBERT A. VAN NEST

10
Attorneys For Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

11
12
13
14

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE

15

I, Peter A. Bicks, the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Joint

16

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding the Testimony of Jonathan Schwartz, hereby attest

17

that Robert Van Nest has concurred in this filing.

18

Dated:

April 25, 2016

By:

/s/ Peter A. Bicks

19
20
21
[PROPOSED] ORDER

22
23
24
25

The foregoing stipulation is approved, and Oracle’s Summary Motion in Limine Re. the
Testimony of Jonathan Schwartz, ECF 1696 at 18, is denied as moot without prejudice to refiling
in the event it is no longer moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

April 25, 2016.
Date: _____________________

_________________________________
Honorable William H. Alsup
Judge of the United States District Court
2

JOINT STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE THE TESTIMONY OF J. SCHWARTZ
Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA