Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1732

REQUEST FOR BRIEFING RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE Motions due by 4/29/2016. Responses due by 5/3/2016.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 4/26/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,

REQUEST FOR BRIEFING RE
MOTIONS IN LIMINE

Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 10-03561 WHA

A prior order required Google to withdraw its third and fifth motions in limine from the

17

pretrial conference calendar without prejudice to consideration after the opening statements

18

(Dkt. No. 1591). By FRIDAY, APRIL 29 AT NOON, Oracle will please respond to Google’s

19

motions regarding the Lindholm email and regarding testimony suggesting violations of privacy

20

or antitrust laws. Google may reply by TUESDAY, MAY 3 AT NOON.

21

Also by FRIDAY AT NOON, Oracle shall file its full motion reflected in its fourth

22

summary motion in limine to exclude evidence and argument that copying was required to use

23

the Java language. In addition, Oracle may fully brief one additional summary motion in

24

limine. Google shall respond by TUESDAY AT NOON.

25

On the same schedule, Google shall file its full motion reflected in its first summary

26

motion in limine to preclude expert testimony that recites a preferred version of disputed facts.

27

Google may also fully brief one additional summary motion in limine. Oracle shall respond by

28

TUESDAY AT NOON.

1
2
3

The full briefs on the summary motions in limine shall not exceed TWELVE PAGES IN
TOTAL

(both motions), with any new exhibits not to exceed TWENTY PAGES.
The Court has read all of the parties’ summary motions in limine, and with the exception

4

of the foregoing (and the motion regarding the admissibility of the testimony of Jonathan

5

Schwartz regarding the existence of a legal claim by Sun, now resolved by stipulation), the

6

Court is inclined to deny all relief.

7

To be clear, this additional briefing is in addition to the briefing on Google’s earlier

8

motions that the Court ordered withdrawn. All of the motions referenced above will likely be

9

decided on the papers.
Finally, the parties shall please bring an agreed-on one-page list of all testifying

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

witnesses for use in the jury questionnaire to the final pretrial conference as well as the one-

12

page statement of the case, the timeline, and all other items previously requested.

13
14
15

Dated: April 26, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2