Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1823
FURTHER ITEMS FOR THURSDAY HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/4/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE INC.,
FURTHER ITEMS FOR
THURSDAY HEARING
Defendant.
/
15
16
17
18
No. C 10-03561 WHA
In addition to the questions set forth in the agenda for Thursday’s hearing, the parties
shall please be prepared to address the following:
1.
Could OEMs have made proprietary changes to an OpenJDK-
19
based version of Android without implicating the viral effect of the GPLv2? If
20
so, how? If not, why not? To the extent the answers differ between a
21
hypothetical implementation in 2007 and the 2015 implementation in Android N,
22
please identify the differences.
23
2.
To what extent is it true that the Classpath Exception disposed of
24
the requirement imposed on licensees (under the GPLv2) to contribute back to the
25
public domain all code written by the licensees using OpenJDK, including
26
reimplemented APIs?
27
28
Dated: May 4, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?