Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1823

FURTHER ITEMS FOR THURSDAY HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/4/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., FURTHER ITEMS FOR THURSDAY HEARING Defendant. / 15 16 17 18 No. C 10-03561 WHA In addition to the questions set forth in the agenda for Thursday’s hearing, the parties shall please be prepared to address the following: 1. Could OEMs have made proprietary changes to an OpenJDK- 19 based version of Android without implicating the viral effect of the GPLv2? If 20 so, how? If not, why not? To the extent the answers differ between a 21 hypothetical implementation in 2007 and the 2015 implementation in Android N, 22 please identify the differences. 23 2. To what extent is it true that the Classpath Exception disposed of 24 the requirement imposed on licensees (under the GPLv2) to contribute back to the 25 public domain all code written by the licensees using OpenJDK, including 26 reimplemented APIs? 27 28 Dated: May 4, 2016. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?