Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
186
ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL, Order by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part #170 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER PARTIALLY
GRANTING MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
/
15
16
No. C 10-03561 WHA
Google Inc. seeks leave to file portions of its Daubert motion and supporting documents
17
under seal (Dkt. No. 170). As to exhibits A, H, I, J, L, M, P, Q, R, and W to the Weingaertner
18
declaration, the motion is GRANTED. Google may file those documents under seal.
19
As to the Leonard declaration and the brief, however, the administrative motion cannot be
20
granted at this time. The redacted portions of those documents include public information, and
21
the supporting declaration submitted by Google is too general to support the sealing of any
22
confidential Google information (Dkt. No. 170-1). Counsel will be given one opportunity to
23
remedy these deficiencies as follows.
24
By JUNE 24, 2011, Google may submit a supplemental declaration supporting its
25
administrative motion and more narrowly redacted versions of the brief and the Leonard
26
declaration. The supplemental declaration should specifically identify any confidential Google
27
information to be redacted from those documents and explain why it is sealable. Only
28
confidential material that is specifically addressed in either the supplemental declaration or the
1
Sarboraria declaration (Dkt. No. 184 at ΒΆ 13) may be redacted. Additionally, counsel should
2
submit chambers copies of the full documents with the redacted portions highlighted.
3
Counsel are reminded that no document, declaration, or motion (including administrative
4
motions) may be filed under seal without an individualized sealing order, and that other relevant
5
guidelines are set forth in the local rules and the protective order for this action (Dkt. No. 68).
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: June 21, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?