Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 187

Declaration of Scott T. Weingaertner (Supplemental) in Support of Google, Inc.'s #170 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Google Inc.. (Sabnis, Cheryl) (Filed on 6/24/2011) Modified on 6/27/2011 (wsn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (SBN 112279) fzimmer@kslaw.com CHERYL A. SABNIS (SBN 224323) csabnis@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 101 Second Street – Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 318-1200 Facsimile: (415) 318-1300 IAN C. BALLON (SBN 141819) ballon@gtlaw.com HEATHER MEEKER (SBN 172148) meekerh@gtlaw.com GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 1900 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 328-8500 Facsimile: (650) 328-8508 SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice) sweingaertner@kslaw.com ROBERT F. PERRY rperry@kslaw.com BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice) bbaber@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065 rvannest@kvn.com CHRISTA M. ANDERSON - #184325 canderson@kvn.com KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 ORACLE AMERICA, INC. Case No. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA 20 Honorable Judge William Alsup 21 Plaintiff, v. 22 GOOGLE INC. 23 24 Defendant. SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL (DKT. NO. 170) 25 26 27 28 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL (DKT. NO. 170) CIVIL ACTION NO. CV 10-03561-WHA 1 I, Scott T. Weingaertner, declare as follows: 2 I am a partner in the law firm of King & Spalding LLP, counsel to Google Inc. in the 3 present case. Pursuant to the Court’s Order Partially Granting Motion to File Documents Under 4 Seal (Dkt. No. 186), I submit this supplemental declaration in support of Defendant Google 5 Inc.’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (Dkt. No. 170). I make this declaration based 6 on my own personal knowledge. If called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to 7 the matters set forth herein. 8 9 1. Portions of Google Inc.’s Brief in Support of Daubert Motion (e.g., 5:8-17, 5:28- 6:1, 6:5-8, 6:10-17, 6:20-23, 13:24-28, 17:6-13, 18:22-23, 18:25-27, 19:4-9, 19:19, 19:22-20:2, 10 20:12-15, 21:28-22:2, 22:16-21, 23:1-8, and 23:26-24:3) are to be filed under seal pursuant to the 11 Order Approving Stipulated Protective Order Subject to Stated Conditions (Dkt. No. 68) 12 governing this case because they contain information that has been designated Confidential or 13 Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only by Oracle America, Inc. See Declaration of 14 Matthew Sarboraria in Response to Google’s Administrative Motion to Seal (Dkt. No. 184), at 15 ¶ 13. 16 2. Portions of the Declaration of Gregory K. Leonard, Ph.D. (e.g., portions of ¶¶ 16 17 and 20, and footnotes 2 and 3) are to be filed under seal pursuant to the Order Approving 18 Stipulated Protective Order Subject to Stated Conditions (Dkt. No. 68) governing this case 19 because they contain information that has been designated Confidential or Highly Confidential - 20 Attorneys’ Eyes Only by Oracle America, Inc. See Declaration of Matthew Sarboraria in 21 Response to Google’s Administrative Motion to Seal (Dkt. No. 184), at ¶ 13. 22 3. Portions of footnote 6 of the Declaration of Gregory K. Leonard, Ph.D. are to be 23 filed under seal pursuant to the Order Approving Stipulated Protective Order Subject to Stated 24 Conditions (Dkt. No. 68) governing this case because they contain the names of companies with 25 which Google had technology partnership discussions. Disclosure of the identities of Google’s 26 potential and actual business partners, which Google does not share publicly during the normal 27 course of business, would cause great and undue harm to Google’s business. 28 4. Portions of footnotes 10 and 16 of the Declaration of Gregory K. Leonard, Ph.D. 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL (DKT. NO. 170) CIVIL ACTION NO. CV 10-03561-WHA 1 are to be filed under seal pursuant to the Order Approving Stipulated Protective Order Subject to 2 Stated Conditions (Dkt. No. 68) governing this case because they contain references to Google’s 3 internal proprietary metrics and statistics. Google considers its internal metrics to be highly 4 confidential business information and does not disclose them to the public during the normal 5 course of business. Disclosure of its internal proprietary metrics and statistics would cause great 6 and undue harm to Google’s business. 7 5. Portions of ¶ 27 of the Declaration of Gregory K. Leonard, Ph.D. are to be filed 8 under seal pursuant to the Order Approving Stipulated Protective Order Subject to Stated 9 Conditions (Dkt. No. 68) governing this case because they contain per device revenue estimates 10 that reveal and are based on highly confidential financial information of Google Inc. Disclosure 11 of this highly sensitive financial information would cause great and undue harm to Google’s 12 business. 13 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing facts are true and correct. 14 Executed on June 24, 2011 in New York, New York. 15 16 /s/ Scott T. Weingaertner /s/ Scott T. Weingaertner 17 18 I hereby attest that Scott T. Weingaertner concurs in the filing of this document. /s/ Cheryl A. Sabnis /s/ Cheryl A. Sabnis 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL (DKT. NO. 170) CIVIL ACTION NO. CV 10-03561-WHA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?