Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1949

Disregard, See #1950 FINAL CHARGE TO THE JURY (PHASE ONE) AND SPECIAL VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/23/16. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Special Verdict Form)(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2016) Modified on 5/23/2016 (dtmS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-03561 WHA v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 13 GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 16 17 18 Has Google shown by a preponderance of the evidence that its use in Android of the 19 declaring lines of code and their structure, sequence, and organization from Java 2 20 Standard Edition Version 1.4 and Java 2 Standard Edition Version 5.0 constitutes a “fair 21 use” under the Copyright Act? 22 Yes _________________ (finding for Google) No 23 _________________ (finding for Oracle) 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May __, 2016. FOREPERSON 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-03561 WHA v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 13 GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 16 17 18 Has Google shown by a preponderance of the evidence that its use in Android of the 19 declaring lines of code and their structure, sequence, and organization from Java 2 20 Standard Edition Version 1.4 and Java 2 Standard Edition Version 5.0 constitutes a “fair 21 use” under the Copyright Act? 22 Yes _________________ (finding for Google) No 23 _________________ (finding for Oracle) 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May __, 2016. FOREPERSON 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-03561 WHA v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 13 GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 16 17 18 Has Google shown by a preponderance of the evidence that its use in Android of the 19 declaring lines of code and their structure, sequence, and organization from Java 2 20 Standard Edition Version 1.4 and Java 2 Standard Edition Version 5.0 constitutes a “fair 21 use” under the Copyright Act? 22 Yes _________________ (finding for Google) No 23 _________________ (finding for Oracle) 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May __, 2016. FOREPERSON 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-03561 WHA v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 13 GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 16 17 18 Has Google shown by a preponderance of the evidence that its use in Android of the 19 declaring lines of code and their structure, sequence, and organization from Java 2 20 Standard Edition Version 1.4 and Java 2 Standard Edition Version 5.0 constitutes a “fair 21 use” under the Copyright Act? 22 Yes _________________ (finding for Google) No 23 _________________ (finding for Oracle) 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May __, 2016. FOREPERSON 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-03561 WHA v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 13 GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 16 17 18 Has Google shown by a preponderance of the evidence that its use in Android of the 19 declaring lines of code and their structure, sequence, and organization from Java 2 20 Standard Edition Version 1.4 and Java 2 Standard Edition Version 5.0 constitutes a “fair 21 use” under the Copyright Act? 22 Yes _________________ (finding for Google) No 23 _________________ (finding for Oracle) 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May __, 2016. FOREPERSON 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-03561 WHA v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 13 GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 16 17 18 Has Google shown by a preponderance of the evidence that its use in Android of the 19 declaring lines of code and their structure, sequence, and organization from Java 2 20 Standard Edition Version 1.4 and Java 2 Standard Edition Version 5.0 constitutes a “fair 21 use” under the Copyright Act? 22 Yes _________________ (finding for Google) No 23 _________________ (finding for Oracle) 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May __, 2016. FOREPERSON 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-03561 WHA v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 13 GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 16 17 18 Has Google shown by a preponderance of the evidence that its use in Android of the 19 declaring lines of code and their structure, sequence, and organization from Java 2 20 Standard Edition Version 1.4 and Java 2 Standard Edition Version 5.0 constitutes a “fair 21 use” under the Copyright Act? 22 Yes _________________ (finding for Google) No 23 _________________ (finding for Oracle) 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May __, 2016. FOREPERSON 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-03561 WHA v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 13 GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 16 17 18 Has Google shown by a preponderance of the evidence that its use in Android of the 19 declaring lines of code and their structure, sequence, and organization from Java 2 20 Standard Edition Version 1.4 and Java 2 Standard Edition Version 5.0 constitutes a “fair 21 use” under the Copyright Act? 22 Yes _________________ (finding for Google) No 23 _________________ (finding for Oracle) 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May __, 2016. FOREPERSON 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-03561 WHA v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 13 GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 16 17 18 Has Google shown by a preponderance of the evidence that its use in Android of the 19 declaring lines of code and their structure, sequence, and organization from Java 2 20 Standard Edition Version 1.4 and Java 2 Standard Edition Version 5.0 constitutes a “fair 21 use” under the Copyright Act? 22 Yes _________________ (finding for Google) No 23 _________________ (finding for Oracle) 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May __, 2016. FOREPERSON 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 10-03561 WHA v. SPECIAL VERDICT FORM 13 GOOGLE INC., Defendant. 14 / 15 YOUR ANSWER MUST BE UNANIMOUS. 16 17 18 Has Google shown by a preponderance of the evidence that its use in Android of the 19 declaring lines of code and their structure, sequence, and organization from Java 2 20 Standard Edition Version 1.4 and Java 2 Standard Edition Version 5.0 constitutes a “fair 21 use” under the Copyright Act? 22 Yes _________________ (finding for Google) No 23 _________________ (finding for Oracle) 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May __, 2016. FOREPERSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?