Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
201
Declaration of Christopher Carnaval in Support of #192 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal PORTIONS OF OPPOSITION TO GOOGLES DAUBERT MOTION AND EXHIBITS filed byGoogle Inc.. (Related document(s) #192 ) (Purcell, Daniel) (Filed on 7/5/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #84065
rvannest@kvn.com
CHRISTA M. ANDERSON - #184325
canderson@kvn.com
DANIEL PURCELL - #191424
dpurcell@kvn.com
710 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
Telephone: (415) 391-5400
Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
KING & SPALDING LLP
SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice)
sweingaertner@kslaw.com
ROBERT F. PERRY
rperry@kslaw.com
BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice)
bbaber@kslaw.com
1185 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-4003
Telephone: (212) 556-2100
Facsimile: (212) 556-2222
KING & SPALDING LLP
DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (SBN 112279)
fzimmer@kslaw.com
CHERYL A. SABNIS (SBN 224323)
csabnis@kslaw.com
101 Second Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 318-1200
Facsimile: (415) 318-1300
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
IAN C. BALLON (SBN 141819)
ballon@gtlaw.com
HEATHER MEEKER (SBN 172148)
meekerh@gtlaw.com
1900 University Avenue, Fifth Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: (650) 328-8500
Facsimile: (650) 328-8508
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
Case No. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
22
DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER
CARNAVAL IN RESPONSE TO ORACLE
AMERICA, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
GOOGLE INC.,
23
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER CARNAVAL IN RESPONSE TO
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA
568319.01
DMSLIBRARY01-16883953.1
1
I, Christopher Carnaval, declare as follows:
2
I am an associate in the law firm of King & Spalding LLP, counsel to Google Inc.
3
(“Google”) in the present case. I submit this declaration in response to Oracle America, Inc.’s
4
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (Dkt. No. 192). I make this declaration based on my
5
own personal knowledge. If called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to the
6
matters set forth herein.
7
1.
I have reviewed Oracle America, Inc.’s Opposition to Google’s Daubert Motion
8
(Dkt. No. 191) and the Declaration of Fred Norton in Support of Oracle America, Inc.’s
9
Opposition to Google’s Daubert Motion (“Norton Declaration”) (Dkt. No. 191-1.)
10
2.
Google believes that Exhibits C, D, K and M, which Oracle America, Inc.
11
(“Oracle”) attaches to the Norton Declaration, and the references to confidential portions of these
12
materials currently redacted in Oracle’s Brief as set forth below should be filed under seal.
13
These materials either are or reference materials properly designated Confidential or Highly
14
Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only pursuant to the Order Approving Stipulated Protective
15
Order Subject to Stated Conditions entered in this case (Dkt. No. 68).
16
3.
Exhibit C, and references to confidential portions of Exhibit C currently redacted
17
in Oracle’s Brief (e.g., 2:5-:7, 9:8-:9, 14:23-:25), are to be filed under seal pursuant to the Order
18
Approving Stipulated Protective Order Subject to Stated Conditions (Dkt. No. 68) governing this
19
case because they refer to a highly confidential business deal review presentation intended for
20
high-level Google executives. The presentation in Exhibit C discusses the proposed terms of a
21
potential business deal and reveal a potential business strategy for Android. Disclosure of this
22
information, which Google does not share publicly during the normal course of business, would
23
cause great and undue harm to Google’s business.
24
4.
Exhibit D, and references to confidential portions of Exhibit D currently redacted
25
in Oracle’s Brief (e.g., 2:16-:17, 14:23-15:1, footnote 6), are to be filed under seal pursuant to the
26
Order Approving Stipulated Protective Order Subject to Stated Conditions (Dkt. No. 68)
27
governing this case because they contain or refer to highly sensitive information concerning
28
internal discussions about licensing and business strategies for Android. Disclosure of Google’s
1
568319.01
DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER CARNAVAL IN RESPONSE TO
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA
1
highly sensitive licensing and business strategies, which Google does not share publicly during
2
the normal course of business, would cause great and undue harm to Google’s business.
3
5.
Exhibit K, and references to confidential portions of Exhibit K currently redacted
4
in Oracle’s Brief (e.g., 12:21-:24), are to be filed under seal pursuant to the Order Approving
5
Stipulated Protective Order Subject to Stated Conditions (Dkt. No. 68) governing this case
6
because they contain references to confidential business and licensing negotiations involving
7
Google. Disclosure of information concerning its confidential business and licensing
8
negotiations, which Google does not share publicly during the normal course of business, would
9
cause great and undue harm to Google’s business.
10
6.
Exhibit M, and references to confidential portions of Exhibit M currently redacted
11
in Oracle’s Brief (e.g., 22:15-:17), are to be filed under seal pursuant to the Order Approving
12
Stipulated Protective Order Subject to Stated Conditions (Dkt. No. 68) governing this case
13
because they contain or refer to highly sensitive internal discussions concerning technical and
14
business strategies for Android. Disclosure of information concerning highly sensitive technical
15
and business strategies, which Google does not share publicly during the normal course of
16
business, would cause great and undue harm to Google’s business.
17
7.
Google believes that other currently redacted portions of Oracle’s Brief (e.g., 6:1,
18
14:18-15:4, 22:11-:13), which refer to portions of the Expert Report of Dr. Iain M. Cockburn that
19
are based on or reflect materials properly designated by Google as Confidential or Highly
20
Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only, should be filed under seal. These materials include highly
21
sensitive financial information concerning Android, as well as highly sensitive discussions of
22
technical, business, and licensing strategies concerning Android.
23
8.
Google states no position as to whether disclosure of materials marked by Oracle
24
as Confidential or Highly Confidential - Attorneys’ Eyes Only material would case harm to
25
Oracle.
26
9.
In conclusion, Google does not oppose Oracle’s Administrative Motion and
27
submits herewith a proposed Order Sealing Google Inc.’s Confidential Information. Disclosure
28
of this material would cause great and undue harm to Google’s business.
2
568319.01
DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER CARNAVAL IN RESPONSE TO
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA
1
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing facts are true and correct.
2
Executed on July 5, 2011 in New York, New York.
3
/s/ Christopher Carnaval /s/
Christopher Carnaval
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
568319.01
DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER CARNAVAL IN RESPONSE TO
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561 WHA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?