Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
210
NOTICE REGARDING ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR JULY 21 HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 12, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
No. C 10-03561 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
NOTICE REGARDING
ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
FOR JULY 21 HEARING
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
/
15
16
In reading the Daubert briefing, it appears possible that early on Google recognized that it
17
would infringe patents protecting at least part of Java, entered into negotiations with Sun to obtain
18
a license for use in Android, then abandoned the negotiations as too expensive, and pushed home
19
with Android without any license at all. How accurate is this scenario? Does Google
20
acknowledge that Android infringes at least some of the claims if valid? If so, how should this
21
affect the damages analysis? How should this affect the questions of willfulness and equitable
22
relief? Counsel should be prepared to address these issues at the hearing.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: July 12, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?