Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 365

ORDER denying #280 as untimely filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 9/8/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
Plaintiff,

11

v.

12

GOOGLE, INC.,

13

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL AS UNTIMELY
FILED

Defendant.
___________________________________/

14
15

Before the court is the parties’ joint discovery letter dated August 5, 2011. [Docket No.

16

280.] Despite the August 5, 2011 date on the letter’s face, the court notes that Defendant filed the

17

letter on August 8, 2011. The deadline for filing motions to compel discovery in this matter,

18

however, closed on August 5, 2011. [See Docket No. 257.] On August 16, 2011, the court filed an

19

order to show cause as to why the court should not treat the letter as untimely filed. [Docket No.

20

306.] Defendant submitted its responses on August 23, 2011. [Docket No. 351.] Having examined

21

all relevant papers, the court determines that the letter was untimely filed and, therefore, DENIES

22

Defendant’s motion to compel.

ER

R NIA
FO

. Ryu

onna M

Judge D

H

28

RT

27

Dated: August 29, 2011

NO

26

D
DENIE

LI

25

A

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

24

S

23
UNIT
ED

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C-10-03561-WHA (DMR)

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge