Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
365
ORDER denying #280 as untimely filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 9/8/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
GOOGLE, INC.,
13
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL AS UNTIMELY
FILED
Defendant.
___________________________________/
14
15
Before the court is the parties’ joint discovery letter dated August 5, 2011. [Docket No.
16
280.] Despite the August 5, 2011 date on the letter’s face, the court notes that Defendant filed the
17
letter on August 8, 2011. The deadline for filing motions to compel discovery in this matter,
18
however, closed on August 5, 2011. [See Docket No. 257.] On August 16, 2011, the court filed an
19
order to show cause as to why the court should not treat the letter as untimely filed. [Docket No.
20
306.] Defendant submitted its responses on August 23, 2011. [Docket No. 351.] Having examined
21
all relevant papers, the court determines that the letter was untimely filed and, therefore, DENIES
22
Defendant’s motion to compel.
ER
R NIA
FO
. Ryu
onna M
Judge D
H
28
RT
27
Dated: August 29, 2011
NO
26
D
DENIE
LI
25
A
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
24
S
23
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C-10-03561-WHA (DMR)
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?