Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 394

ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT ORDER FOR RULE 706 EXPERT re #393 Proposed Order filed by Google Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 6, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 No. C 10-03561 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT ORDER FOR RULE 706 EXPERT GOOGLE INC., Defendant. / 15 16 The proposed order regarding the assignment for the Rule 706 expert (Dkt. No. 393) is 17 acknowledged. The parties are requested to submit a revised version of the proposed order in 18 accordance with the following guidance. 19 First, precise deadlines should be set for the completion of Dr. Kearl’s expert report and 20 deposition. As stated in the August 30 order appointing Dr. Kearl, his assignment should be 21 planned such that it can be completed by early December in preparation for a possible damages 22 trial at that time. Allowing a nebulous “reasonable period of time” for completion of those tasks 23 would risk undue delay. The Court may consider altering the deadlines for Dr. Kearl’s report and 24 deposition in light of future case developments, but in the meantime a workable schedule must be 25 established and followed. 26 Second, Dr. Kearl’s role as a Rule 706 expert will be to inform the jury on the issue of 27 damages, not to advise the Court. The assignment order should not make reference to Dr. Kearl 28 assisting the Court. 1 2 3 Third, counsel are requested to proofread the proposed order carefully and correct all typographical errors such as missing words. The revised version of the proposed order should be filed by SEPTEMBER 8, 2011. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: September 6, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?