Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
518
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 12, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 10-03561 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION
HEARING AND SETTING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
/
14
15
Due to a congested law-and-motion calendar and an ongoing patent trial, the motion
16
hearing previously set for October 13 is CONTINUED to a special setting at 9:30 A.M. ON
17
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 19, 2011. A case management conference will be held concurrently.
18
Counsel should be prepared to address the following issues:
19
1.
How much time the Rule 706 expert will require to
20
complete his work. In particular, a time estimate for completing an
21
independent damages study as opposed to only critiquing the
22
studies provided by the parties’ damages experts.
23
2.
The possibility of severing the copyright claim from
24
the patent claims and first conducting a shorter trial on the
25
copyright claim.
26
3.
The possibility of general postponement and how
27
best to use any intervening time, for example with respect to
28
motion practice.
1
For the benefit of counsel, please be alerted there is a strong possibility that the final
2
pretrial conference set for October 24 will have to be postponed. The Court will try to provide
3
counsel with more scheduling information at the October 19 hearing and conference.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: October 12, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?