Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
617
ORDER COMPELLING DEPOSITIONS AND PRODUCTION OF MATERIALS re #614 Letter filed by Oracle America, Inc., #615 Response ( Non Motion ) filed by Google Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 14, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
/
11
For the Northern District of California
ORDER COMPELLING
DEPOSITIONS AND
PRODUCTION
OF MATERIALS
v.
10
United States District Court
No. C 10-03561 WHA
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
12
The November 11 letter from plaintiff’s counsel (Dkt. No. 614) is deemed a motion to
13
compel depositions of the interviewees upon whom defendant’s “spoon-fed” damages experts
14
relied. Having considered defendant’s response (Dkt. No. 615), the motion is GRANTED IN PART
15
as follows.
16
All but one of the seven interviewees have been deposed or offered for deposition already,
17
so there is less need for doing it again. Plaintiff may select a total of three of the seven
18
interviewees and depose each for two hours without break. Defendant must produce at the
19
deposition any materials used by the deponent in supplying information to the experts. No other
20
materials need be produced. The questioning shall be limited to the subject of the interviews and
21
the information provided to the expert and its accuracy.
22
By NOON ON NOVEMBER 15, 2011, plaintiff must designate the three individuals it will
23
depose. By NOON ON NOVEMBER 17, 2011, defendant then must identify the times and locations
24
where those individuals will be made available for deposition. The depositions must be
25
completed by NOVEMBER 22, 2011. All depositions shall take place within the Bay Area.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: November 14, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?