Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 631

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO SUBMIT COLOR-CODED HANDOUT OF CLAIMS TO BE TRIED re #630 Letter filed by Oracle America, Inc., #626 Letter filed by Google Inc., #587 Order. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 22, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2011)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Plaintiff,
v.

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER
TO SUBMIT COLOR-CODED
HANDOUT OF CLAIMS TO
BE TRIED

GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
/

13
14

No. C 10-03561 WHA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

There seems to be confusion between the parties regarding whether obviousness

15

combinations should be allowed in the color-coded handout. They should not be. The

16

color-coded handouts are strictly for evaluating anticipation by single references. Please

17

conform accordingly.

18

The parties should also include a legend on each page that identifies the meaning of the

19

red lining, and the blue and gray highlighting with the names of anticipatory references, such as

20

“missing from Android” and “missing from Reference X.”

21

A new joint handout must be filed by NOON ON NOVEMBER 30, 2011.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 22, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE