Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 636

ORDER REGARDING PATENT MARKING re #635 Statement filed by Google Inc., #634 Statement filed by Oracle America, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 1, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER REGARDING
PATENT MARKING

GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 10-03561 WHA

Having read the parties’ letters dated November 30, 2011, counsel are requested to show

17

cause by 5:00 PM TOMORROW why the following procedure should not be adopted in order to

18

streamline and manage the trial.

19

Counsel for Oracle shall identify, for each of the 26 asserted claims, each Oracle product,

20

Oracle-licensed product, Sun product, or Sun-licensed product that practiced the claim during the

21

alleged damages period from January 1, 2007 through July 20, 2010, the time of actual notice.

22

This must be filed by DECEMBER 16, 2011. In making this submission, counsel shall keep in

23

mind that they are officers of the court and full candor is required.

24

By DECEMBER 30, 2011, counsel for Google shall respond and identify any further

25

products by Oracle or Sun that practiced any of the 26 asserted claims, specifying with

26

particularity which ones and why. Counsel shall keep in mind that they are officers of the court

27

and full candor is required. Mere allegations will not suffice. Google will only list products they

28

can prove practiced the asserted claims.

1

After reviewing these submissions, the Court will determine the appropriate next steps.

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: December 1, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2