Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 639

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING PATENT MARKING re #638 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Oracle America, Inc., #636 Order. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 5, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Plaintiff, v. SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING PATENT MARKING GOOGLE INC., Defendant. / 13 14 No. C 10-03561 WHA ORACLE AMERICA, INC., A prior order requested the parties’ response to the Court’s proposed plan regarding patent 15 marking (Dkt. No. 636). Oracle filed its response and sought to add a new feature to the plan: 16 Google should identify products in Oracle’s submission that Google contends do not practice the 17 claims, in addition to identifying further products that practice the claims (Dkt. No. 638). The 18 deadline in the prior order has passed and Google has not yet filed a response. Counsel for 19 Google shall please comment on the Court’s proposed plan and also address the additional feature 20 that Oracle has suggested by NOON TODAY. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 5, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?