Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
639
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING PATENT MARKING re #638 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Oracle America, Inc., #636 Order. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 5, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2011)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
v.
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER
REGARDING PATENT
MARKING
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
/
13
14
No. C 10-03561 WHA
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
A prior order requested the parties’ response to the Court’s proposed plan regarding patent
15
marking (Dkt. No. 636). Oracle filed its response and sought to add a new feature to the plan:
16
Google should identify products in Oracle’s submission that Google contends do not practice the
17
claims, in addition to identifying further products that practice the claims (Dkt. No. 638). The
18
deadline in the prior order has passed and Google has not yet filed a response. Counsel for
19
Google shall please comment on the Court’s proposed plan and also address the additional feature
20
that Oracle has suggested by NOON TODAY.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: December 5, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?