Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
843
REQUEST FOR FURTHER BRIEFING AND TO SUBMIT AGREED-ON TIMELINE. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 2, 2012.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff,
v.
REQUEST FOR FURTHER
BRIEFING AND TO SUBMIT
AGREED-ON TIMELINE
GOOGLE INC.,
12
Defendant.
/
13
14
No. C 10-03561 WHA
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
In the submissions due on Tuesday please include your analysis of the CONTU report,
15
which the Judge has now read with interest. Please also quote from any relevant passages in the
16
committee reports following up on the CONTU report, that is, to what extent did Congress
17
intend to adopt the report?
18
In addition, please include a critique of Professor Pamela Samuelson’s article in 85 Texas
19
Law Review 1921 (2007). If there are one or two other treatises or articles you recommend,
20
please cite them and give a sentence as to their importance.
21
22
Also, by Monday the 9th at noon counsel shall file the agreed-on timeline to hand out to
the jury.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: April 2, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?