Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 926

Statement Joint Statement of the Case for Voir Dire by Google Inc., Oracle America, Inc.. (Peters, Marc) (Filed on 4/15/2012)

Download PDF
[counsel listed on signature page] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 11 Plaintiff, JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE Defendant. Date: April 16, 2011 Dept.: Courtroom 8, 19th Floor Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup 12 v. 13 GOOGLE INC. Case No. CV 10-03561 WHA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1523547 1 Pursuant to Paragraph 8 of the Court’s Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial Conference 2 in Civil Jury Cases (last revised March 5, 2012), Oracle America, Inc. and Google Inc. provide 3 the following joint statement of the case to be read to the jury during voir dire: 4 5 STATEMENT OF THE CASE This is a case about alleged infringement of copyrights and patents. The plaintiff, the 6 entity that has brought this case, is Oracle America, Inc. The defendant in this case is Google, 7 Inc. Oracle America accuses Google of infringing particular Oracle America copyrights and 8 patents. 9 Oracle America was formerly known as Sun Microsystems. When Oracle Corporation 10 bought Sun in January 2010, Sun’s name changed to Oracle America. The copyrights and patents 11 in this case were originally assigned to Sun Microsystems, and stayed with the company when it 12 was renamed Oracle America. During this trial, Oracle America may sometimes be referred to as 13 “Oracle” or “Sun.” 14 The trial of this case will proceed in separate phases. 15 Phase 1 of the case will relate to Oracle’s copyright claims. Oracle claims that Google 16 infringes Oracle’s copyrights by copying Java software and related documentation into Google’s 17 Android software and related documentation. Google claims that certain aspects of the 18 copyrighted works do not qualify for copyright protection, and that Google’s use of certain 19 information qualifies as a “fair use” under copyright law. Google further claims that, because of 20 Sun’s and Oracle’s prior actions, inaction, and statements, Oracle should not be permitted to 21 enforce these copyrights against Google. Your job at the end of Phase 1 will be to decide whether 22 Google is liable for infringing Oracle’s copyrights. 23 Phase 2 of the case will relate to Oracle’s patent claims. Oracle claims that Google’s 24 Android software and mobile phones infringe two U.S. Patents. Google claims that, because of 25 Sun’s and Oracle’s prior actions, inaction, and statements, Oracle should not be permitted to 26 enforce these patents against Google. Your job at the end of Phase 2 will be to decide whether 27 Google is liable for infringing the asserted claims in these two patents. 28 JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1523547 1 Phase 3 of the case will relate to the damages, if any, attributable to any infringement by 1 2 Google of Oracle’s copyrights or patents, and the question of whether any such infringement was 3 willful. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1523547 2 1 Dated: April 15, 2012 2 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Marc David Peters 3 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725) mdpeters@mofo.com DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 209624) dmuino@mofo.com 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 4 5 6 7 8 9 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) dboies@bsfllp.com 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177) sholtzman@bsfllp.com 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ORACLE CORPORATION DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049) dorian.daley@oracle.com DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527) deborah.miller@oracle.com MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600) matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 506-5200 Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 17 18 19 20 21 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1523547 3 1 Dated: April 15, 2012 2 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP By: /s/ Matthias A. Kamber 3 SCOTT T. WEINGAERTNER (Pro Hac Vice) sweingaertner@kslaw.com ROBERT F. PERRY rperry@kslaw.com BRUCE W. BABER (Pro Hac Vice) bbaber@kslaw.com 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Telephone: (212) 556-2100 Facsimile: (212) 556-2222 4 5 6 7 8 DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (SBN 112279) fzimmer@kslaw.com CHERYL A. SABNIS (SBN 224323) csabnis@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 101 Second Street - Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 318-1200 Facsimile: (415) 318-1300 9 10 11 12 13 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP IAN C. BALLON (SBN 141819) ballon@gtlaw.com HEATHER MEEKER (SBN 172148) meekerh@gtlaw.com 1900 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 328-8500 Facsimile: (650) 328-8508 14 15 16 17 18 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065) rvannest@kvn.com CHRISTA M. ANDERSON (SBN184325) canderson@kvn.com DANIEL PURCELL (SBN 191424) dpurcell@kvn.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 19 20 21 22 23 24 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. 25 26 27 28 JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1523547 4 ATTESTATION 1 2 3 4 I, Marc David Peters, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Matthias A. Kamber has concurred in this filing. 5 6 Date: April 15, 2012 /s/ Marc David Peters 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE CASE NO. CV 10-03561 WHA pa-1523547 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?