Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
951
ORDER RE BRIEF DUE SUNDAY. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 21, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
No. C 10-03561 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER RE BRIEF DUE SUNDAY
GOOGLE INC.,
14
Defendant.
/
15
16
The judge would like counsel to answer the following in the briefs due Sunday:
17
1.
18
19
Do any of the Sun compiled lines in the 37 APIs call upon part or all of another
API as a step?
2.
If so, do the accused APIs likewise call upon the same other API? That is, even
20
though the implementations are different from the Sun implementation, do the
21
accused APIs borrow from other APIs in the same pattern?
22
3.
If the answer to question 1 is yes, do any of the compiled lines in the 37 Sun APIs
23
call upon part or all of another API outside the 37? Put differently, is all of the
24
cross referencing done within the 37?
25
26
27
28
Call upon, as used herein, means a line of code that invokes the name of the other API,
1
including the arguments, and the using the return in the follow-on compiled lines. This would be
2
done to save reinventing the same code already resident in another API.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: April 21, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?