Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 978

ORDER REGARDING THE 702 PATENT by Hon. William Alsup denying #970 Motion.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. ORDER REGARDING THE ’702 PATENT GOOGLE INC., Defendant. / 15 16 No. C 10-03561 WHA Before the trial date was set, a substantial question was pending whether to wait until the 17 PTO had finished all re-exam proceedings before commencing trial. To remove this 18 consideration from the calculus, Oracle offered to dismiss with prejudice all patents that had 19 been rejected in a final office action subject to reinstatement in the event the PTO reversed itself 20 prior to the start of trial. In express reliance on this (Dkt. No. 786), the Court set the early trial 21 date requested by Oracle. That trial date (April 16) started on time and at that moment the 22 dismissals with prejudice became final. 23 A few days later, the PTO did reverse itself as to the ’702 patent but the reversal came a 24 few days too late, for the trial had already started and the dismissals with prejudice had already 25 become effective. 26 Oracle’s argument that the patent “trial” has not yet started is wrong. The was and is one 27 trial with three phases. The trial started on April 16. This is not only the plain meaning of the 28 term but any other interpretation would inject great prejudice given that the parties have relied 1 on the issues to be tried and that reliance should not be turned on its head in mid-trial. Oracle 2 will be required to stand by its word and live with the dismissal with prejudice. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: April 25, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?