Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Johnson et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER for Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Katrina Johnson f/k/a Katrina Snowden and Withdrawal of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/16/10. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2010)

Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Johnson et al

Doc. 26

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881) [e-mail] Annie S. Wang (SBN 243027) [e-mail] Nicole L. Drey (SBN 250235) [e-mail] J. Andrew Coombs, A P. C. 517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202 Glendale, California 91206 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated Rodney B. Sorensen (SBN 196926) [e-mail] Payne & Fears LLP Attorneys at Law One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2300 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Robert R. Brunelli, admitted pro hac vice [e-mail] Patricia Y. Ho, admitted pro hac vice [e-mail] Sheridan Ross PC 1560 Broadway, Suite 1200 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Katrina Johnson f/k/a Katrina Snowden, an individual and d/b/a www.royaldiscount.com and Royal Discount, and Royal Distribution Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO) Adobe Systems Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Katrina Johnson, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C10-3568 SC JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT KATRINA JOHNSON f/k/a KATRINA SNOWDEN AND WITHDRAWAL OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Adobe v. Johnson, et al.: Stipulation re Dismissal

-1-

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2

Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Katrina Johnson f/k/a Katrina Snowden, an individual ("Johnson"), and Royal Distribution, Inc. ("RDI") (collectively

3

"Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as
4

follows:
5

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Defendants on or about August 13, 2010;
6

WHEREAS Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss Katrina Johnson Pursuant to Fed. R.
7

Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and 28 U.S.C. 1400(a); and to Dismiss Defendants for Improper Venue Under 28
8

U.S.C. 1391(b); or in the Court's Discretion, to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)
9

("Motion") on or about October 25, 2010;
10

WHEREAS Defendant Johnson has sworn to her part-time position at Defendant RDI and
11

lack of managerial or decision-making duties;
12

WHEREAS Defendant Johnson understands that the statements made in her declaration
13

submitted in connection with Defendants' Motion are subject to the penalty of perjury;
14

WHEREAS Defendants acknowledge that the Court has personal jurisdiction over
15

Defendant RDI;
16

WHEREAS Defendants acknowledge that venue is proper in the Northern District of
17

California over the claims asserted against Defendant RDI;
18

WHEREAS each party will bear its own fees and costs in connection with Plaintiff's claims
19

against Defendant Johnson;
20

WHEREAS the Parties stipulate that Defendant RDI shall have until November 29, 2010,
21

to file an Answer to the Complaint; and
22 23

///
24 25

///
26 27

///
28
Adobe v. Johnson, et al.: Stipulation re Dismissal

-2-

November 16
UNIT ED

S

ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

Judge S

amuel C

onti

R NIA

IT IS S

O ORD

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT
H