Tan et al v. Coast Crane Company et al

Filing 51

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 28, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 YU LIAN TAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 No. C-10-3570 MMC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT’S STANDING ORDERS v. COAST CRANE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 15 / 16 17 On December 21, 2012, plaintiffs filed opposition to defendant Coast Crane 18 Company’s motion for summary judgment, as well as a declaration in support of the 19 opposition. Plaintiffs have violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s 20 standing orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each 21 document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); 22 see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 23 ¶ 2. 24 Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the 25 Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above- 26 referenced documents. Plaintiffs are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply 27 with the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed 28 document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the 1 record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely 2 provided to the Court. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: December 28, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?