Tan et al v. Coast Crane Company et al
Filing
51
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 28, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
YU LIAN TAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
No. C-10-3570 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
COAST CRANE COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
On December 21, 2012, plaintiffs filed opposition to defendant Coast Crane
18
Company’s motion for summary judgment, as well as a declaration in support of the
19
opposition. Plaintiffs have violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s
20
standing orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each
21
document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7);
22
see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
23
¶ 2.
24
Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
25
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-
26
referenced documents. Plaintiffs are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply
27
with the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed
28
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
1
record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely
2
provided to the Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: December 28, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?