Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Davachi et al
Filing
31
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending the ADR deadline to August 17, 2011. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 5/18/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881)
andy@coombspc.com
Nicole L. Drey (SBN 250235)
nicole@coombspc.com
J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp.
517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202
Glendale, California 91206
Telephone: (818) 500-3200
Facsimile:
(818) 500-3201
Attorneys for Plaintiff/CounterDefendant Adobe Systems Incorporated
John L. Krieger (SBN 212325)
jkrieger@lrlaw.com
Lewis and Roca LLP
3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: (702) 949-8304
Facsimile:
(709) 949-8365
Jason M. Rhodes (Pro hac vice to be submitted)
jason@jmrlawgroup.com
JMR Law Group
1100 Dexter Avenue North, Suite 100
Seattle, Washington 98109
Telephone: (206) 633-7833
Facsimile:
(206) 633-7834
Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)
19
20
Adobe Systems Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
21
22
v.
Reza Davachi, et al.,
23
Defendants.
24
ALL RELATED CLAIMS
25
26
27
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C10-3575 SC
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
ADR DEADLINE
PLAINTIFF Adobe Systems Incorporated (“Adobe” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its
counsel of record, Nicole L. Drey, of J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp., and Defendants Reza
28
Adobe v. Davachi, et al.: Joint Stipulation to Extend ADR
Deadline
-1-
1
2
Davachi, an individual and d/b/a ProjectContactAfrica; Bahareh Davachi, an individual and d/b/a
ProjectContactAfrica; Gayle Barnes, an individual and d/b/a www.directdeals.com; DirectDeals,
3
LLC; and G.W.J. Sourcenet Distribution, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their
4
5
counsel of record, John L. Krieger, of Lewis and Roca LLP, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS the Complaint was filed in the above-captioned matter on or about August 13,
6
7
2010;
8
9
WHEREAS the Court held a Case Management Conference on February 18, 2011, at which
time the Court ordered the Parties to mediation;
10
WHEREAS the deadline to complete ADR is currently set for May 19, 2011;
11
WHEREAS the Parties had originally scheduled mediation for May 10, 2011;
12
WHEREAS the appointed mediator canceled the mediation session on May 6, 2011, and
13
14
has withdrawn as the appointed mediator for the case;
WHEREAS a conference call was held between the Parties and the ADR Office on May 17,
15
16
2011, at which time the ADR Office noted that it would take another two (2) to three (3) weeks to
17
appoint a new mediator and time thereafter to schedule and arrange for the mediation;
18
WHEREAS the ADR Office suggested requesting at least a 90-day continuance of the ADR
19
deadline; and
20
WHEREAS no other Court deadlines will be affected by an extension of the ADR deadline.
21
22
23
///
24
25
///
26
27
28
Adobe v. Davachi, et al.: Joint Stipulation to Extend ADR
Deadline
-2-
1
2
3
NOW, THEREFORE, Adobe and Defendants stipulate and request the Court to extend the
ADR deadline to August 17, 2011, or a date thereafter acceptable with the Court.
DATED: May 18, 2011
J. Andrew Coombs, A Professional Corp.
4
By: ___/s Nicole L. Drey_______________________
J. Andrew Coombs
Nicole L. Drey
Attorneys for Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated
5
6
7
DATED: May 18, 2011
Lewis and Roca LLP
8
By: ___/s John L. Krieger______________________
John L. Krieger
Attorneys for Defendants
9
10
11
12
13
14
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO REQUEST, IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
UNIT
ED
18
RT
U
O
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
R NIA
May 18,
DATED: _______________, 2011
S
Samuel Conti
UNITED STATES DISTRICT ti
JUDGE
uel Con
NO
am
Judge S
RT
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Adobe v. Davachi, et al.: Joint Stipulation to Extend ADR
Deadline
-3-
A
H
ER
21
FO
19
LI
16
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?