Tuttle et al v. Sky Bell Asset Management LLC et al

Filing 276

ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 18, 2011 re 275 Response ( Non Motion ), Response ( Non Motion ) filed by Wendy Meg Siegel, The Braun Family Trust, Eric Braun, Edgar W. Tuttle. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 22, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

EDGAR W. TUTTLE, ERIC BRAUN, THE
BRAUN FAMILY TRUST, and WENDY MEG
SIEGEL, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,

14
15

ORDER REGARDING REQUEST
FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER
DATED NOVEMBER 18, 2011

Plaintiffs,

12
13

No. C 10-03588 WHA

v.
SKY BELL ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
/

16
17

Plaintiffs ask if they need to file an additional motion to extend the deadlines for fact and

18

expert discovery and to associate co-counsel. They do not. The order dated November 18, 2011,

19

granted an extension of both deadlines (Dkt. No. 274 at 4). The order also granted leave to file an

20

expedited motion to continue certain pretrial dates based on the understanding that plaintiffs also

21

sought leave to file a motion to extend other pretrial deadlines. Based on plaintiffs’ instant

22

request for clarification, it appears this was not the case and that plaintiffs only sought leave to

23

extend the fact and expert discovery deadline and deadline to associate co-counsel. As those

24

deadlines have already been extended, plaintiffs need not file an expedited motion to continue.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: November 22, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE