Tuttle et al v. Sky Bell Asset Management LLC et al

Filing 38

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [re 36 Stipulation filed by McGladrey & Pullen, LLP]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 11/12/2010. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2010)

Download PDF
Tuttle et al v. Sky Bell Asset Management LLC et al Doc. 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 EDGAR W. TUTTLE, ERIC BRAUN, THE BRAUN FAMILY TRUST, and WENDY MEG SIEGEL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SKY BELL ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, GARY R. MARKS, GEOFFREY M. GOTSCH, MICHAEL SELL, AGILE SKY ALLIANCE FUND, LP, AGILE SKY ALLIANCE FUND GP, LLC, AGILE GROUP LLC, GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC., d/b/a AGILE INVESTORS, INC., NEAL GREENBERG, EDEN ROCK FINANCE FUND, LP, SOLID ROCK MANAGEMENT LIMITED, ERCM LLP, SANTO VOLPE, ERNEST & YOUNG LLC, NIGHT WATCH PARTNERS, LP, SKY BELL OFFSHORE PARTNERS, LTD., PIPELINE INVESTORS, LP, SKY BELL SELECT, LP, WAILED PARTNERS, LP, WAILED CAPITAL GP, LLC, WAILED ADVISORS, LP, PROSPECT CAPITAL, LLC, WILLIAM BELHUMEUR, ROTHSTEIN KASS & COMPANY, P.C., MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP, and DOES 1­15, Defendants. / No. C 10-03588 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Good cause not shown, the Court DENIES the parties' stipulation to continue the case management conference. The order addressing the remand motion will be filed long before the case management conference will take place. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 12, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?