Bottoni et al v. SLM Corporation et al
Filing
122
ORDER VACATING PENDING HEARINGS AND TERMINATING PENDING MOTIONS (ECF NOS. 101 & 110): re 110 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RETAIN CONFIDENTIALITY filed by Paul Roberts, Shawnee Silva, Angelo Bottoni, Tracie Serrano, 101 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Sallie Mae, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/3/2012. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
Northern District of California
10
San Francisco Division
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
ANGELO BOTTONI; PAUL ROBERTS;
AND TRACIE SERRANO and SHAWNEE
SILVA for themselves and all others similarly
situated,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
No. C 10-03602 LB
ORDER VACATING PENDING
HEARINGS AND TERMINATING
PENDING MOTIONS
v.
SALLIE MAE, INC.; and DOES 1 through
1,000, inclusive,
[ECF NOS. 101 & 110]
16
17
18
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
The parties have advised the court that they have settled the case. In light of that, the court
19
vacates the pending motion now set for December 13, 2012 at 11 a.m. and sets a case management
20
conference for January 17, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. If the parties file dismissal papers before then, the
21
court will vacate the case management conference.
22
In light of this, the court terminates the pending motions as moot without prejudice. Should the
23
parties not finalize a settlement, they may refile the motion and may do so by incorporating the prior
24
docket entry by reference (as opposed to filing new motions).
25
This disposes of ECF Nos. 101 & 110.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 3, 2012
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
28
C 10-03602 LB (ORDER)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?