Implicit Networks, Inc v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filing 62

ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777)
[e-mail]
GEORGE F. BISHOP (CA Bar No. 89205)
[e-mail]
DIANE S. RICE (CA Bar No. 118303)
[e-mail]
WILLIAM P. NELSON (CA Bar No. 196091)
[e-mail]
HOSIE RICE LLP
Transamerica Pyramid, 34th Floor
600 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] Tel.
[phone] Fax
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12

13 IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.,
Case No. C 10-3606 SI

14

Plaintiff,

15 v.
16
17

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

CASE NO. C 10-3606 SI

1
2

On this day, Plaintiff Implicit Networks, Inc. (“Implicit”) and Defendant Cisco
Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”), announced to the Court that they have settled their respective claims

3
for relief asserted in this case. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion

4
5
6

that their request for dismissal should be GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled cause and all claims against

7 Cisco by Implicit and against Implicit by Cisco herein are dismissed with prejudice to the re8 filing of same.
9
10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses
shall be borne by each party incurring the same.

11
12

This is a final judgment.

13
14

3rd
Oct.
Signed this _____ day of ______________, 2011.

15
___________________________________
JUDGE SUSAN ILLSTON
U.S. District Court

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

1

CASE NO. C 10-3606 SI