Curtis v. Astrue
Filing
9
ORDER case is referred for reassignment to a Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/2/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2010)
<![CDATA[
Curtis v. Astrue
Doc. 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
*E-Filed 11/2/10*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
OMOTE J. CURTIS, et al., v. Plaintiff,
No. C 10-3673 RS ORDER
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendants. ____________________________________/
Pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Civil Local Rule 73-1(b), all parties have submitted written consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge to conduct any and all further proceedings herein, including the order and entry of final judgment. Accordingly, the case is referred for reassignment to a magistrate judge.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 11/2/10 RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
