Hamilton v. Shoopman et al

Filing 21

USCA ORDER (11-72230) : No further filings shall be accepted in this closed case. DENIED. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2011)

Case: 11-72230

10/18/2011

ID: 7931946

DktEntry: 4

Page: 1 of 2

FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OCT 18 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

In re: BERNARD LEE HAMILTON.

No. 11-72230

BERNARD LEE HAMILTON,

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-03682-SI
Northern District of California,
San Francisco

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO,
Respondent,
COLLEEN SHOOPMAN; et al.,
Real Parties in Interest.

Before: GRABER, RAWLINSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of
this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v.
United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition
is denied.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.
The motion for stay of proceedings in the district court is denied as moot.
AM/MOATT

Case: 11-72230

10/18/2011

ID: 7931946

DktEntry: 4

Page: 2 of 2

No further filings shall be accepted in this closed case.
DENIED.

AM/MOATT

2

11-72230