Hamilton v. Shoopman et al
USCA ORDER (11-72230) : No further filings shall be accepted in this closed case. DENIED. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2011)
Page: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OCT 18 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
In re: BERNARD LEE HAMILTON.
BERNARD LEE HAMILTON,
D.C. No. 3:10-cv-03682-SI
Northern District of California,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO,
COLLEEN SHOOPMAN; et al.,
Real Parties in Interest.
Before: GRABER, RAWLINSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of
this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v.
United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.
The motion for stay of proceedings in the district court is denied as moot.
Page: 2 of 2
No further filings shall be accepted in this closed case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?