Rambus Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation

Filing 36

ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White denying 16 Motion to Transfer Case (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2010)

Download PDF
Rambus Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation Doc. 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RAMBUS INC., Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant. / ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER No. C 10-03736 JSW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Now before the Court is the motion filed by plaintiff Rambus Inc. ("Rambus") for intradistrict transfer to the San Jose division of this Court. This matter is now fully briefed and ripe for consideration. The Court finds that this matter is appropriate for disposition without oral argument and is deemed submitted. See Civ. L.R. 7-19(b). Accordingly, the hearing set for November 5, 2010 is HEREBY VACATED. Having carefully reviewed the parties' papers, considered their arguments and the relevant authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby denies Plaintiffs' motion. Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 3-2(d), intellectual property cases are excepted from the rule that actions will be assigned to the division of this Court where the action arises. Instead, the rule provides that intellectual property cases are to be assigned on a district-wide basis. The Court cannot contravene the Local Rules and transfer this specific /// /// Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 intellectual property matter to the San Jose division. According, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 28, 2010 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?