Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/16/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2010)

Download PDF
Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company Doc. 12 Case3:10-cv-03746-JCS Document8 Filed09/14/10 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Katherine Kelly Lutton (CA State Bar No. 194971) lutton@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, California 94070-1526 Telephone: (650) 839-5070 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY Spencer Hosie (CA State Bar No. 101777) shosie@hosielaw.com HOSIE RICE LLP 188 The Embarcadero, Suite 750 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 247-6000 Facsimile: (415) 247-6001 Attorneys for Plaintiff IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. CV10-3746 JCS STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Plaintiff Implicit Networks, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("Defendant"), hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows: WHEREAS, on or about August 24, 2010, Plaintiff served its Original Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial ("Complaint") upon Defendant; WHEREAS, the answer or other response to the Complaint is presently due on or before September 14, 2010; 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. CV10-3746 JCS Dockets.Justia.com Case3:10-cv-03746-JCS Document8 Filed09/14/10 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, no trial date has yet been set in this action; and WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective counsel of record have agreed to extend the time by which Defendant must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that Defendant will have to and including November 12, 2010, to serve and file an answer or other response to the Complaint. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that by entering into this stipulation, none of the parties waive any rights with respect to the issues presented in this litigation and, specifically, Defendant does not waive any rights or defenses with respect to the Complaint. Dated: September 14, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Katherine Kelly Lutton Katherine Kelly Lutton Attorney for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY Dated: September 14, 2010 HOSIE RICE LLP By: /s/ Spencer Hosie Spencer Hosie Attorney for Plaintiff IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC. 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. CV10-3746 JCS Case3:10-cv-03746-JCS Document8 Filed09/14/10 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNIT ED DECLARATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Spencer Hosie. Dated: September 14, 2010 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: /s/ Katherine Kelly Lutton Katherine Kelly Lutton Attorney for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY ISTRIC ES D TC AT T 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RT U O S Dated: 9/16/10 ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO Judge Jo seph C. Spero R NIA O ORD IT IS S ERED NO RT H 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. CV10-3746 JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?