Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 94

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 93 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/5/2012)

1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
IMPLICIT NETWORKS INC.,

No. C 10-03746 SI

7
Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
Defendant.

/

Currently before the Court is Implicit Network’s third motion to compel discovery (Docket No.

13
93). Implicit challenges the sufficiency of HP’s responses to Implicit’s first set of requests for
14
production relating to HP’s Tipping Point/Threat Suppression Engine (“TSE”) family of accused
15
products. Docket No. 93. Implicit complains that it is unclear whether HP has provided full responses
16
to the RFPs because, in correspondence between the parties, HP has not clarified whether it is resting
17
on objections and, if so, which objections it is resting on. Also HP has not, according to Implicit,
18
identified an end date when its unspecified “supplemental disclosures” will be completed. Id. As of
19
this date, HP has not filed a response to Implicit’s motion to compel.
20
The Court ORDERS HP to file, by close of business June 8, 2012, a response clearly
21
identifying, for documents related to the TSE family of accused products: (1) which objections it is still
22
asserting and the grounds for those objections; (2) whether document production is complete for the
23
TSE family of accused products; and, if not, (3) when document production will be complete for the
24
TSE family of accused products.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: June 5, 2012
27
28

SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge