Yates v. Mangosteen et al

Filing 6

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 5 FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/24/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 5/25/11* 1 2 3 4 Renée Welze Livingston (SBN 124280) Jason G. Gong (SBN 181298) LIVINGSTON LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 1600 South Main Street, Suite 280 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Tel: (925) 952-9880 Fax: (925) 952-9881 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant PHILIP TRI NGUYEN, individually and dba MANGOSTEEN 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRAIG YATES, an individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. MANGOSTEEN; CITI PROPERTIES DE LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and PHILIP TRI NGUYEN, an individual dba MANGOSTEEN, 16 Defendants. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:10-CV-03747-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Complaint Filed: August 23, 2010 Trial Date: None 18 19 Plaintiff CRAIG YATES (“plaintiff”), an individual, and defendant Philip Tri Nguyen, an 20 individual dba MANGOSTEEN (“defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of 21 record, hereby request and make the following stipulation: 22 1. Whereas, plaintiff, having not received a responsive pleading from defendant CITI 23 PROPERTIES DE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CITI PROPERTIES”), and 24 having not received any communication in response to inquiries made by plaintiff’s counsel to 25 counsel for defendant CITI PROPERTIES concerning defendant’s answer; 26 2. Whereas, plaintiff subsequently investigated and discovered that the ownership 27 interest once held by defendant CITI PROPERTIES in 601 Larkin Street, San Francisco, CA 28 94109 (the property where the Mangosteen Restaurant is located) had been judicially foreclosed __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Yates v. Mangosteen, et al., Case No. 3:10-CV-03747-RS Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Leave to File First Amended Complaint 1 1 by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of WBCMT 2007-C31 Buchanan Street, Ltd. v. 2 Ritz Apartments DE, LLC, et al., (S.F. Superior Court Case No. CGC-09-488876) in favor of 3 plaintiff WBCMT 2007-C31 Buchanan Street, Ltd.; 4 3. Whereas, the judicial foreclosure proceeding transferred title and ownership interest 5 in the property located at 601 Larkin Street from defendant CITI PROPERTIES to WBCMT 6 2007-C31 Buchanan Street, Ltd.; 7 8 9 10 4. Whereas, plaintiff seeks to prosecute his action against the owner of the Mangosteen Restaurant and the owner of the property located at 601 Larkin Street; 5. Whereas, defendant Philip Tri Nguyen, an individual dba MANGOSTEEN, previously filed an answer to plaintiff’s complaint on November 15, 2010; 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 12 That plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint to name WBCMT 2007-C31 13 Buchanan Street, Ltd. as a defendant and that the answer previously filed by defendant Philip Tri 14 Nguyen, an individual dba MANGOSTEEN, on November 15, 2010 may serve as defendant’s 15 answer to the First Amended Complaint. 16 17 Respectfully submitted, Dated: May 20, 2011 THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 18 19 /s/ Thomas E. Frankovich 20 By: _____________________________________ Thomas E. Frankovich Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES, an individual 21 22 23 24 Dated: May 20, 2011 LIVINGSTON LAW FIRM 25 /s/ Jason G. Gong 26 27 28 By: _____________________________________ Jason G. Gong Attorneys for Defendant Philip Tri Nguyen, an individual dba MANGOSTEEN __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Yates v. Mangosteen, et al., Case No. 3:10-CV-03747-RS Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Leave to File First Amended Complaint 2 1 2 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff CRAIG YATES, an individual, may file a 3 First Amended Complaint in this matter and that the answer previously filed by defendant Philip 4 Tri Nguyen, an individual dba MANGOSTEEN, on November 15, 2010 may serve as 5 defendant’s answer to the First Amended Complaint. 6 7 8 9 24 DATED: May _____, 2011 _____________________________________ Honorable Richard Seeborg UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Yates v. Mangosteen, et al., Case No. 3:10-CV-03747-RS Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Leave to File First Amended Complaint 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?