Yates v. Mangosteen et al
Filing
6
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 5 FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/24/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)
*E-Filed 5/25/11*
1
2
3
4
Renée Welze Livingston (SBN 124280)
Jason G. Gong (SBN 181298)
LIVINGSTON LAW FIRM
A Professional Corporation
1600 South Main Street, Suite 280
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Tel: (925) 952-9880
Fax: (925) 952-9881
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
PHILIP TRI NGUYEN, individually
and dba MANGOSTEEN
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CRAIG YATES, an individual,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
vs.
MANGOSTEEN; CITI PROPERTIES DE
LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
Company; and PHILIP TRI NGUYEN, an
individual dba MANGOSTEEN,
16
Defendants.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:10-CV-03747-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Complaint Filed: August 23, 2010
Trial Date: None
18
19
Plaintiff CRAIG YATES (“plaintiff”), an individual, and defendant Philip Tri Nguyen, an
20
individual dba MANGOSTEEN (“defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of
21
record, hereby request and make the following stipulation:
22
1. Whereas, plaintiff, having not received a responsive pleading from defendant CITI
23
PROPERTIES DE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“CITI PROPERTIES”), and
24
having not received any communication in response to inquiries made by plaintiff’s counsel to
25
counsel for defendant CITI PROPERTIES concerning defendant’s answer;
26
2. Whereas, plaintiff subsequently investigated and discovered that the ownership
27
interest once held by defendant CITI PROPERTIES in 601 Larkin Street, San Francisco, CA
28
94109 (the property where the Mangosteen Restaurant is located) had been judicially foreclosed
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yates v. Mangosteen, et al., Case No. 3:10-CV-03747-RS
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Leave to File First Amended Complaint
1
1
by the San Francisco Superior Court in the matter of WBCMT 2007-C31 Buchanan Street, Ltd. v.
2
Ritz Apartments DE, LLC, et al., (S.F. Superior Court Case No. CGC-09-488876) in favor of
3
plaintiff WBCMT 2007-C31 Buchanan Street, Ltd.;
4
3. Whereas, the judicial foreclosure proceeding transferred title and ownership interest
5
in the property located at 601 Larkin Street from defendant CITI PROPERTIES to WBCMT
6
2007-C31 Buchanan Street, Ltd.;
7
8
9
10
4. Whereas, plaintiff seeks to prosecute his action against the owner of the Mangosteen
Restaurant and the owner of the property located at 601 Larkin Street;
5. Whereas, defendant Philip Tri Nguyen, an individual dba MANGOSTEEN,
previously filed an answer to plaintiff’s complaint on November 15, 2010;
11
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
12
That plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint to name WBCMT 2007-C31
13
Buchanan Street, Ltd. as a defendant and that the answer previously filed by defendant Philip Tri
14
Nguyen, an individual dba MANGOSTEEN, on November 15, 2010 may serve as defendant’s
15
answer to the First Amended Complaint.
16
17
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: May 20, 2011
THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
18
19
/s/ Thomas E. Frankovich
20
By: _____________________________________
Thomas E. Frankovich
Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES, an
individual
21
22
23
24
Dated: May 20, 2011
LIVINGSTON LAW FIRM
25
/s/ Jason G. Gong
26
27
28
By: _____________________________________
Jason G. Gong
Attorneys for Defendant Philip Tri Nguyen,
an individual dba MANGOSTEEN
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yates v. Mangosteen, et al., Case No. 3:10-CV-03747-RS
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Leave to File First Amended Complaint
2
1
2
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff CRAIG YATES, an individual, may file a
3
First Amended Complaint in this matter and that the answer previously filed by defendant Philip
4
Tri Nguyen, an individual dba MANGOSTEEN, on November 15, 2010 may serve as
5
defendant’s answer to the First Amended Complaint.
6
7
8
9
24
DATED: May _____, 2011
_____________________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yates v. Mangosteen, et al., Case No. 3:10-CV-03747-RS
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Leave to File First Amended Complaint
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?