The American Civil Liberties Union of North California et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Filing
150
ORDER TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTS FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/6/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES
UNION OF NORTH CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
11
Case No. 10-cv-03759-RS
ORDER TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTS
FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
12
13
The FBI asserts that attorney-client privilege applies to redacted portions of Human Source
14
Advisory Notices. At this juncture, there remain questions about whether some of the FBI’s
15
redactions properly protect communications protected by attorney-client privilege. Out of an
16
abundance of caution, in camera review of those documents is appropriate to resolve the FBI’s
17
motion for summary judgment. Thus, the FBI shall provide the court the unredacted Human
18
Source Advisory Notices within seven (7) days of this order.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: November 6, 2015
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?